House Health Care Vote: Breaking Updates

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - House Health Care Vote: Breaking Updates stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |  Ryan Grim, Sam Stein, Lila Shapiro, & Nico Pitney
First Posted: 11- 7-09 09:44 AM   |   Updated: 11- 8-09 02:52 AM

What's Your Reaction?
Health Care

After months of debate, the House of Representatives passed historic health care reform legislation late on Saturday evening. Read the overview AP coverage HERE, and follow Twitter reaction HERE.

In a victory for President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed landmark health care legislation Saturday night to expand coverage to tens of millions who lack it and place tough new restrictions on the insurance industry. Republican opposition was nearly unanimous.

The 220-215 vote (click here to see how each member voted) cleared the way for the Senate to begin a long-delayed debate on the issue that has come to overshadow all others in Congress.

A triumphant Speaker Nancy Pelosi likened the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later. "Oh, what a night!" she proclaimed at the beginning of a press conference held after the vote. Obama issued a statement saying, "I look forward to signing it into law by the end of the year."

"It provides coverage for 96 percent of Americans. It offers everyone, regardless of health or income, the peace of mind that comes from knowing they will have access to affordable health care when they need it," said Rep. John Dingell, the 83-year-old Michigan lawmaker who has introduced national health insurance in every Congress since succeeding his father in 1955.

In the run-up to a final vote, conservatives from the two political parties joined forces to impose tough new restrictions on abortion coverage in insurance policies to be sold to many individuals and small groups. They prevailed on a roll call of 240-194.

Ironically, that only solidified support for the legislation, clearing the way for conservative Democrats to vote for it.

The legislation would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide federal subsidies to those who otherwise could not afford it. Large companies would have to offer coverage to their employees. Both consumers and companies would be slapped with penalties if they defied the government's mandates.

Story continues below
advertisement

Insurance industry practices such as denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions would be banned, and insurers would no longer be able to charge higher premiums on the basis of gender or medical history. In a further slap, the industry would lose its exemption from federal antitrust restrictions on price fixing and market allocation.

At its core, the measure would create a federally regulated marketplace where consumers could shop for coverage. In the bill's most controversial provision, the government would sell insurance, although the Congressional Budget Office forecasts that premiums for it would be more expensive than for policies sold by private firms.

A cheer went up from the Democratic side of the House when the bill gained 218 votes, a majority. Moments later, Democrats counted down the final seconds of the voting period in unison, and let loose an even louder roar when Pelosi grabbed the gavel and declared, "the bill is passed."

The bill drew the votes of 219 Democrats and Rep. Joseph Cao, a first-term Republican who holds an overwhelmingly Democratic seat in New Orleans. Opposed were 176 Republicans and 39 Democrats.

WATCH: THE FINAL VOTE


WATCH: THE POST-VOTE PRESS CONFERENCE


From the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada issued a statement saying, "We realize the strong will for reform that exists, and we are energized that we stand closer than ever to reforming our broken health insurance system."

In his written statement, Obama praised the House's action and said, "now the United State Senate must follow suit and pass its version of the legislation. I am absolutely confident it will."

Nearly unanimous in their opposition, minority Republicans cataloged their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, $1.2 trillion legislation.

United in opposition, minority Republicans cataloged their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, $1.2 trillion legislation.

"We are going to have a complete government takeover of our health care system faster than you can say, `this is making me sick,'" jabbed Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., adding that Democrats were intent on passing "a jobs-killing, tax-hiking, deficit-exploding" bill.

But with little doubt about the outcome, the rhetoric lacked the fire of last summer's town hall meetings, when some critics accused Democrats of plotting "death panels" to hasten the demise of senior citizens.

The bill is projected to expand coverage to 36 million uninsured, resulting in 96 percent of the nation's eligible population having insurance.

To pay for the expansion of coverage, the bill cuts Medicare's projected spending by more than $400 billion over a decade. It also imposes a tax surcharge of 5.4 percent on income over $500,000 in the case of individuals and $1 million for families.

The bill was estimated to reduce federal deficits by about $104 billion over a decade, although it lacked two of the key cost-cutting provisions under consideration in the Senate, and its longer-term impact on government red ink was far from clear.

Democrats lined up a range of outside groups behind their legislation, none more important than the AARP, whose support promises political cover against the cuts to Medicare in next year's congressional elections.

The nation's drug companies generally support health care overhaul. And while the powerful insurance industry opposed the legislation, it did so quietly, and the result was that Republicans could not count on the type of advertising campaign that might have peeled away skittish Democrats in swing districts.

Over all, the bill envisioned the most sweeping set of changes to the health care system in more than a generation, and Democrats said it marked the culmination of a campaign that Harry Truman began when he sat in the White House 60 years ago.

Debate on the House floor had already begun when Obama strode into a closed-door meeting of the Democratic rank and file across the street from the Capitol to make a final personal appeal to them to pass his top domestic priority.

Later, in an appearance at the White House, he said he had told lawmakers, "to rise to this moment. Answer the call of history, and vote yes for health insurance reform for America."

It appeared that a compromise brokered Friday night on the volatile issue of abortion had finally secured the votes needed to pass the legislation.

As drafted, the measure denied the use of federal subsidies to purchase abortion coverage in policies sold by private insurers in the new insurance exchange, except in cases of incest, rape or when the life of the mother was in danger.

But abortion foes won far stronger restrictions that would rule out abortion coverage except in those three categories in any government-sold plan. It would also ban abortion coverage in any private plan purchased by consumers receiving federal subsidies.

Disappointed Democratic abortion rights supporters grumbled about the turn of events, but pulled back quickly from any thought of opposing the health care bill in protest.

One, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., detailed numerous other benefits for women in the bill, including free medical preventive services and better prescription drug coverage under Medicare. "Women need health care reform," she concluded in remarks on the House floor.

A Republican alternative was rejected on a near party line vote of 258-176.

It relied heavily on loosening regulations on private insurers to reduce costs for those who currently have insurance, in some cases by as much as 10 percent. But congressional budget analysts said the plan would make no dent in the ranks of the uninsured, an assessment that highlighted the difference in priorities between the two political parties.

After months of debate, the House of Representatives passed historic health care reform legislation late on Saturday evening. Read the overview AP coverage HERE, and follow Twitter reaction HERE. In ...
After months of debate, the House of Representatives passed historic health care reform legislation late on Saturday evening. Read the overview AP coverage HERE, and follow Twitter reaction HERE. In ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
20095
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (397 pages total)
- john donne I'm a Fan of john donne 3 fans permalink

CHENEY 2012; he will know how to end this madness.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 11/09/2009
- macday I'm a Fan of macday 6 fans permalink
photo

cHENEY BELONGS IN JAIL

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

Socialists belong in jail for this egregious bill and total disregard for the Constitution.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 11/10/2009

SINGLE PAYER NOW... SHUT DOWN INSURANCE COMPANIES

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 11/09/2009

The Democrats with the overt support of the Obama Admin. have removed any chance of SINGLE PAYER. In fact this bill they just passed CUTS up to $400 BILLION from Medicare Medicaid.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

I wonder what happened to health coverage as good as congress gets? There is a reason the insurance companies where not screaming its because everyone will have to buy from them at a cost of 5 thousand single pay and 15 thousand for family thats yearly. If you don't buy it then you could be fined up to 250 thousand dollars plus sentenced to five years in jail. The good news is they have health care in prison at least until they privatize that system too. Congress just passed another law to help big insurance companies, and we lose again! http://dailycensored.com/2009/11/08/democrats-pass-health-care-bill-in-the-middle-of-the-night/

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 AM on 11/09/2009
- a270 I'm a Fan of a270 7 fans permalink

we have lost our country. Everyday, more people arrive in the country who favor big government and something for nothing. I think we have to enable states to break free of the federal system in order to establish a better form of government where freedom is the focus.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 AM on 11/09/2009
- swellsoire I'm a Fan of swellsoire 9 fans permalink

Who are these "people"? Are they brown people? Who is this this "we" of whom you speak? Are they white people? All of the immigrants whom I have ever met are very hardworking individuals.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 11/09/2009

OMG you are really ridiculous. BIG rePUBLICAN GOVERNMENT or BIG BUSINESS. Which would you rather be tyrannized by? At least if we had FDR-style Big Government back we could be assured there's be atleast a pretense of protecting us from the tyranny of the corporation (including the private Federal Reserve Banks and the Insurance industry).
BIG GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTALBE TO THE PEOPLE THROUGH THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS IS WHAT YOU WANT!!!!
Sadly Obama is looking every day the corporate shill he pretended not to be in the primaries. That's why he flipped on tele-com imunity, Gitmo remains open, the Iraq War rages on despite zero media coverage, why his credit card bill FAILED to STOP INTEREST RATE USURY!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 11/09/2009
- macday I'm a Fan of macday 6 fans permalink
photo

Spammer

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

I just want to know if the leisure class, that exclusive world, the elites will still be able to get their flu shots ahead of the most vulnerable?

Of course that will happen. What am I saying?

This could set an ugly precedent. If we get some form of health care reform, what will law makers want to reform next? Don't all the corporate lobbyists see what is happening here? If you don't throw in for health care, what industry will be next... the financial sector, the energy industry... not defense contractors? Will there be no abusive industry left out in the end? This is war I tell you, W A R!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 AM on 11/09/2009
- nogimmicks I'm a Fan of nogimmicks 28 fans permalink

There is nothing to be excited about, as the Kucinich NO vote proves. Both Republican boycott and the Dem bill are equally supported by the insurance companies that remain in power in both cases. Just like it has happened with the Wallstreet bailout and "reform".

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 11/09/2009
- a270 I'm a Fan of a270 7 fans permalink

Right. The alliance of big government and big business. It is called "fascism". Brought to you by your local democrat party.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 11/09/2009
- swellsoire I'm a Fan of swellsoire 9 fans permalink

You do see how your statement is nothing more than hyperbole? Big government and big business walked hand in hand during the administrations of Eisenhower, Nixon, H. Bush Reagan, and W. Bush. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the dominance of the military industrial complex. Our military spending dwarfs that spent on social programs.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 11/09/2009
- Byron1436 I'm a Fan of Byron1436 11 fans permalink

Actually, Fascism (economically) isn't the 'alliance' of Big Biz and Government, its the ownership of Business by Government. Your argument could really only apply to companies like GM where the Government has taken an active role in its steerage as a company due to its massive impact on the blue collar economy in the USA.
Swellsoire is right, however. The 'alliance' you seem to be referring to between corporate America and the federal Government has been happening for decades and due to the crisis we are beginning to see how inexorably tied together those two entities are. In many ways, this 'alliance' is why the debate on Health Care reform has been filled with such misinforma­tion--corp­orate America has PROFITS on the line if the bill passes, and nobody wants to see their massive salaries reduced even 10%.
Want to know what economic fascism is to progressives? In the 1960s the average CEO made about 40 times the average worker in his company. In the 2000's an average CEO makes 400 times what the average worker in his company makes. We are not an oligarchy, or at least we shouldn't be. If you're going to be mad about something and use the word 'fascism' lightly, at least direct your anger where it should be focused.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

The difference between those who follow Christ and those who follow Satan becomes VERY apparent when viewing these posts.
ANTI-REFORMISTS offer only hell and damnation remarks on how BAD it is to help Americans in need: it’s “socialist” government “take over” of health care; it’s going to bankrupt the country; it’s giving something for nothing. MEANWHILE, they have NOTHING bad to say about the trillion-plus dollars spent on senseless wars and their destruction of life and property. These folks are okay spending their tax dollars on killing and physical destruction, but oppose spending it on HELPING other Americans.
PRO-REFORMISTS want to save American lives and make health care available to those who NEED it: cannot afford it, cannot get it due to pre-existing conditions, or whose coverage is dropped due to illness.
Republicans, their blue-dog coohorts and followers don’t care about people: as long as their money pays for killing and destruction, they are fine with their taxes paying for it. But, if their money goes to save American lives, they want no part of it.
Different independent researchers have placed AMERICAN DEATHS at between 44,000 and 101,000 lives EVERY YEAR due to no insurance or lack of adequate insurance. People with heart believe this is WRONG and something must be done.
I think it’s obvious who is following Christ… and who isn’t.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 11/08/2009
- a270 I'm a Fan of a270 7 fans permalink

Implicit in what you write is a faith in the goodness of government. I have zero trust in the people who work and profit in government. Much better in my view to allow people to opt out of the nanny state. Disallow the mandates and restrictions that government imposes on commercial transactions like the buying and selling of health care and insurance.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 AM on 11/09/2009

All the people in government? Or just certain ones? Which ones exactly do you not have faith in?

What does faith have to do with it? Do you think private enterprise would establish a defense system, build public roads and transportation, and provide health care to everyone who needs it?

Humankind has already tried having no government. We have evolved.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 11/09/2009
photo

Our work is NOT done.

We MUST continue to contact members of the Senate to pass a good bill.

We MUST keep the presure on to make sure that any more foolish_ amendments like the Stooopak amendment do not get merged with the final bill.

The battle_ is NOT over. Continue to make your voices heard.

To the SINGLE PAYER advocates (I am one too); TAKE HEART. Although this is not the bill we would have wanted, we MUST push_ to make this the best bill we can before the final vote!

Please use this link. http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/index.html (contact congress and the senate)

JRT

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 PM on 11/08/2009
- a270 I'm a Fan of a270 7 fans permalink

You are taking away people's freedom by restricting the types and terms of the health insurance they are allowed to purchase. Does that not give you pause?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 11/09/2009
photo

healthcare FOR ALL......men

How splendid reproductive CHOICE for wealthy women only. They always had safe legal abortions, because they could travel to where abortions were legal, or pay for nice upscale doctors to perform illeagal abortions.

Again it will be poor and young women who will die in back alleys.

64 Democrats who supported Stupak amendment....you are in Washington for only ONE MORE year.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/08/2009

I'm a big abortion supporter. The fewer unwanted children I have to support, the better.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 AM on 11/10/2009
photo

I am upset by Nancy Pelosi breaking her promise to post the bill and amendments on the internet at least 72 hours prior to voting on it. Why was it so important to vote so fast and break her promise?

A commentator, I don't remember who, said it's because the promises made to get the last votes are in the amendments. Does anyone know if that's true and if it isn't , what's the reason?

I'm tired of all these politicians lying to us!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 11/08/2009
- mongus I'm a Fan of mongus 7 fans permalink

With all of the repub talk about the House Bill being "DOA" when it reaches the Senate and Lieberwoman says he will 'filibuster' it, what is the best we (those of us who support a public option) could do if the Senate explored a "reconciliation" health care bill instead? Only 50 votes plus one needed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 11/08/2009
- ajwriter I'm a Fan of ajwriter 14 fans permalink

Okay, how about this?

Neocon wackos, let us set up universal healthcare. You can opt out and keep your precious private insurance companies, but you have to sign a sworn affadavit that you will never ask the government for Medicare, Medicaid, or any money for your healthcare if you ever need it, and if you need the government to make your insurer pay, you will reimburse the government for all of its costs.

In fact, if you let us set up universal healthcare (not insurance, care), we Progressives will pay for it all. Just give us back all the money we spent on the wars from the recent reign of Republican domination. From now on, Progressives will pay for all healthcare if you will pay for all war-related expenses. You just have to let us do it our way so we can reduce costs and do it better (and you can still opt out and keep your blood-sucking private insurer). Deal?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 11/08/2009
- Susrem I'm a Fan of Susrem 2 fans permalink

I'm with you......sounds like a fair deal to me!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 11/08/2009

Deal. Serve it up with tea.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 11/09/2009
- sugarfree I'm a Fan of sugarfree 4 fans permalink

And when your private insurer STICKED to your A**, don't want to hear from you, OK.!!!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 11/09/2009

ajwriter..­.Excellent­! So well said. I agree with all you that you said.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 11/09/2009

I watched much of the House debate prior to passage of the "Bill". In watching both Dem and Repubs take to the podium, it was obvious which Party truly represents "America" vesus the one that doesn't. Looking at nothing but Caucasians, one wondered if these Repubs even know (or care) that this country is made up of others who don't look like them. And, the final disgrace was that the ONLY Republican vote for the Bill came from a NON-white! That scene was enough for me. Jimmy Carter, you were vindicated, last night!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 11/08/2009
- ajwriter I'm a Fan of ajwriter 14 fans permalink

This is just crap.

A mandate to buy insurance, but no option for people who have insurance to choose the government "option" if their insurance companies continue to act like mafiosos (which they will, there is absolutely NOTHING in this plan that prevents it).

At least give me the option to choose Medicare over my current insurance piece of crap. You know, the plan that makes me do so much paperwork to get my coverage, it makes my taxes look like nothing. The plan that makes a "mistake" 100% of the time (different mistakes, too) on the first submission of claims from certain providers and labs it doesn't like (i.e., that cost more money or provide unique services). The plan that pays about 20% for out-of-network people, when I'm promised 80%, by claiming a "plan provision" writedown that I am not allowed to have a schedule of in advance of getting the care. The plan that has admitted in court depositions to strategizing to avoid paying the care of people with certain expensive conditions.

This is delivering our country to insurance companies on a platter. Haven't they done enough to suck us dry already? We will not be able to compete in the world economy if we do not develop the courage to do the right thing, which right now is single payer. Or AT LEAST allow those of us who have had it with battling corrupt and ruthless insurance companies to choose something else.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 11/08/2009
- dancucich I'm a Fan of dancucich 12 fans permalink

ajwriter, you are absolutely correct. This is a very flawed bill
that will raise costs for all of us.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:39 AM on 11/09/2009

Can someone please explain the real relevance of this to me? I was under the impression that the house bill was supposed to pass extremely easily (compared to that in the senate) Therefore, why is this such a big accomplishment and how much can we expect this bill to change when it becomes law?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 11/08/2009

Our politicians are owned and this is all a dog and pony show.I was just informed that my premiums are going up 28 percent next year on top of the 22 percent last year.I will be priced out of coverage way before 2013.Social Security was landmark legislation as was Medicare.This bill is a joke.Its time to take our country back and make it a democracy again.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:09 PM on 11/08/2009
- ajwriter I'm a Fan of ajwriter 14 fans permalink

Agreed.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:26 PM on 11/08/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (397 pages total)

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect