[Devon Miles]

Originally Posted by njp

You would have to ask Prof Brown that question.

I think he "mis-spoke". I'll get the cabal to deal with him.

I'll leave asking him for now, i think he may be a bit busy!

[Devon Miles]

Originally Posted by Jellied Eel

I think it should include this video-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

It's quite catchy!

[njp]

Originally Posted by Jellied Eel

As for 'camera toting obsessives', why should the public have to do the agencies job for them? Why weren't the agencies responsible for gathering this data checking the sites and maintaining them?

That would of course have involved them getting out of the office and into the field.

Still, it has had the effect of getting some of the worst sites fixed after they've appeared on Surface Stations, too bad that the historical data from them is pretty worthless.

Have you watched the video Watts tried to ban yet? It's quite amusing, particular the part where NOAA repeated the temperature analysis between 1950 and the present, comparing all 1218 USHCN stations with the results from just the 70 best Watts-approved stations. And guess Watt? The results are identical. It's about 5:00 into the video, or else you can look at this written response from NOAA.

You still haven't explained how you reconcile your belief that global warming isn't happening with your other belief that it is. Cognitive dissonance fascinates me, and I'm eager to learn more about yours.

[fredc]

Originally Posted by Jellied Eel

They have a whole bag of tricks. I notice nobody's named the source of this quote though-

Look I checked out your claims about urban heat spots.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...ntmptrends.php

It turned out to be yet another red herrin.

[troynx]

Why are we still discussing this? Man made climate change has already been proven to be a fraud by redent events. Sorry you warmists but you are clinging to a sinking ship, you have my sympathy.

[Bill Adacio]

Originally Posted by njp

You would have to ask Prof Brown that question.

I think he "mis-spoke". I'll get the cabal to deal with him.

So if they're not mis-speaking, they're falling into traps?

This is starting to come across like an old Ealing comedy.

You'll soon have to be rounding up all those mis-speakers, and freeing all the others from their traps in order to invite them on here and quote the official line to them (or would that come under the much maligned 'quotology' that you're forever trashing?) so that you're all singing from the same hymn sheet.

[Bill Adacio]

Originally Posted by troynx

Why are we still discussing this? Man made climate change has already been proven to be a fraud by redent events. Sorry you warmists but you are clinging to a sinking ship, you have my sympathy.

A fraud?

Whatever gives you that idea? Shape up and get with the programme.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourc...+funds+missing

So far this week, we have the scientists of AGW having been proven to have defrauded the public on the science of climate change, and now the governments who claim to support climate change measures stiffing the poor nations who hope to profit from the entire scam.