Liz Hurley slams 'disgusting paparazzi' - Showbiz

OATZ MM · 02-11-2009, 20:57

She has a point :-

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/...paparazzi.html

MsWalker · 02-11-2009, 20:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by OATZ MM

She has a point :-

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/...paparazzi.html

They have gone to far

The Prumeister · 02-11-2009, 21:10

erm, didn't she use pics of her son in beachwear in an advertising campaign or have I imagined that?

Yes, they went too far if they did indeed print pics of him naked but I'm afraid I've got no time for Elizabeth Hurley. Anyone who refers to members of the public as 'civilians' is very very self important IMHO.

& let's not forget 'that' Versace dress that made her famous - thanks to the paparazzi...

lexy_86 · 02-11-2009, 21:13

I absolutely HATE Elizabeth Hurley, so it really pains me to have to agree with her.

Her child didn't sign up for the media treatment, so they shouldn't even go there. She should sue their asses for the intrusion of his privacy.

And the thought of them taking pictures of the kid naked and putting them online, makes me shudder!

zx50 · 02-11-2009, 21:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Prumeister

erm, didn't she use pics of her son in beachwear in an advertising campaign or have I imagined that?

Yes, they went too far if they did indeed print pics of him naked but I'm afraid I've got no time for Elizabeth Hurley. Anyone who refers to members of the public as 'civilians' is very very self important IMHO.

& let's not forget 'that' Versace dress that made her famous - thanks to the paparazzi...

Where did she say 'civilians' in that article?

zx50 · 02-11-2009, 21:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by lexy_86

I absolutely HATE Elizabeth Hurley, so it really pains me to have to agree with her.

Her child didn't sign up for the media treatment, so they shouldn't even go there. She should sue their asses for the intrusion of his privacy.

And the thought of them taking pictures of the kid naked and putting them online, makes me shudder!

Yes, but all these tabloids think about is that 'money shot'.

newwoman · 02-11-2009, 21:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by zx50

Where did she say 'civilians' in that article?

Not in that article but she once said in an interview that she wouldn't date a 'civilian' as he wouldn't be able to cope with her celebrity life (or words to that effect).

newwoman · 02-11-2009, 21:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by lexy_86

I absolutely HATE Elizabeth Hurley, so it really pains me to have to agree with her.

Her child didn't sign up for the media treatment, so they shouldn't even go there. She should sue their asses for the intrusion of his privacy.

And the thought of them taking pictures of the kid naked and putting them online, makes me shudder!

I agree. I absolutely can not bear Ms Hurley. She is the fakest of all fakes who seems to have convinced herself she's a blue blood and forgetting she grew up in regular, middle class suburbia and just had elecution lessons to sound posher than the Queen.

However, these paps are disgusting and kids are not fair game. Even the Andre kids who have been sold to the highest bidder shouldn't be treated like this, let alone someones child who has not been made public property.

The Prumeister · 02-11-2009, 21:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by zx50

Where did she say 'civilians' in that article?

She didn't say it in that article but she has said it in the past - many times.

myss · 02-11-2009, 22:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Prumeister

She didn't say it in that article but she has said it in the past - many times.

I see what you mean: look at the small paragraph above the third picture.

zx50 · 02-11-2009, 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by newwoman

Not in that article but she once said in an interview that she wouldn't date a 'civilian' as he wouldn't be able to cope with her celebrity life (or words to that effect).

IF she said that, it would seem that she seems to think highly of herself. Again, IF she said this, it appears that she needs to come back down to Earth.

Mr Giggles · 02-11-2009, 22:49

I didn't know she even had a child...who knocked her up? anyone know?

mb@2day · 02-11-2009, 22:52

Quote:

I didn't know she even had a child...who knocked her up? anyone know

Can't remember , some american who coincidentally has lots of money.......funny that .

Mr Giggles · 02-11-2009, 22:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by mb@2day

Can't remember , some american who coincidentally has lots of money.......funny that .

Did she ever marry the wallet?

grahamzxy · 02-11-2009, 23:01

let us all be clear here paps have taken nude photos of a 7 year old child and the posters here take it as an opportunity to slag of the mother.

I wonder how said posters would feel if someone photographed & showed their kids naked online for paedophiles to ogle, wonder if they would enjoy being slagged off as a bonus

some people

LittleChicken · 02-11-2009, 23:02

Never married him, he asked for a DNA test on the child as he thought it wasn't his.

http://www.lukeford.net/profiles/pro...steve_bing.htm

As anyone can see he's the spitting image of him.

Bing.

Damien.

Mr Giggles · 02-11-2009, 23:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by grahamzxy

let us all be clear here paps have taken nude photos of a 7 year old child and the posters here take it as an opportunity to slag of the mother.

Welcome to Digital Spy.

WAKEYLASS · 02-11-2009, 23:04

Whilst I agree that the press were bang out of order publishing naked photos of her son in the first place. Is it just me or does anyone else think that her son at 7 years old is a little too old to be running around a beach naked for all to see in the first place? Liz of all people know that if there is a photo opportunity and money to be made, the paps will get it!

lucy mane · 02-11-2009, 23:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by grahamzxy

let us all be clear here paps have taken nude photos of a 7 year old child and the posters here take it as an opportunity to slag of the mother.

I wonder how said posters would feel if someone photographed & showed their kids naked online for paedophiles to ogle, wonder if they would enjoy being slagged off as a bonus

some people

Well said.

I cannot believe some of these posts.
God forbid these pictures land in the wrong hands which they probably have.

Disgusting when you think about it.

Dan Fortesque · 02-11-2009, 23:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by WAKEYLASS

Whilst I agree that the press were bang out of order publishing naked photos of her son in the first place. Is it just me or does anyone else think that her son at 7 years old is a little too old to be running around a beach naked for all to see in the first place? Liz of all people know that if there is a photo opportunity and money to be made, the paps will get it!

That thought had crossed my mind too.

Rugby Rose · 02-11-2009, 23:07

I thoroughly disapprove of the printing of the kid naked, I disapprove printing a picture of the child at all, BUT...knowing she gets papped everywhere, including on holiday, especially on the beach - a public place, why was her child naked on the beach? Also 7 is a bit old to be on the beach naked anyway isn't it although I would imagine that's a whole other debate.

mb@2day · 02-11-2009, 23:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by LittleChicken

Never married him, he asked for a DNA test on the child as he thought it wasn't his.

http://www.lukeford.net/profiles/pro...steve_bing.htm

As anyone can see he's the spitting image of him.

Bing.

Damien.

Sweet jeez ! I'd be checking both their scalps for anything unusual . He's not really called Damien......

LittleChicken · 02-11-2009, 23:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by mb@2day

Sweet jeez ! I'd be checking both their scalps for anything unusual . He's not really called Damien......

He is, unfortunately......

Mr Giggles · 02-11-2009, 23:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by WAKEYLASS

Whilst I agree that the press were bang out of order publishing naked photos of her son in the first place. Is it just me or does anyone else think that her son at 7 years old is a little too old to be running around a beach naked for all to see in the first place? Liz of all people know that if there is a photo opportunity and money to be made, the paps will get it!

Exactly...Liz should of been more responsible, she of all people should know what to expect when one is famous.

Triple-P · 02-11-2009, 23:34

what are grown men doing taking pictures of nude boys?

02-11-2009, 20:57	#1
OATZ MM Forum Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 5,314	Liz Hurley slams 'disgusting paparazzi' She has a point :- http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/...paparazzi.html

02-11-2009, 21:10	#3
The Prumeister Forum Member Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Oxford Services: Sky+,NTL Broadband Posts: 11,757	erm, didn't she use pics of her son in beachwear in an advertising campaign or have I imagined that? Yes, they went too far if they did indeed print pics of him naked but I'm afraid I've got no time for Elizabeth Hurley. Anyone who refers to members of the public as 'civilians' is very very self important IMHO. & let's not forget 'that' Versace dress that made her famous - thanks to the paparazzi...

02-11-2009, 21:13	#4
lexy_86 Forum Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: in your dreams...... Services: yes please! Posts: 987	I absolutely HATE Elizabeth Hurley, so it really pains me to have to agree with her. Her child didn't sign up for the media treatment, so they shouldn't even go there. She should sue their asses for the intrusion of his privacy. And the thought of them taking pictures of the kid naked and putting them online, makes me shudder!

02-11-2009, 22:49	#12
Mr Giggles Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Croydon, Surrey ♂ Services: Tiscali MAX - Sky + Courier service within the M25 Posts: 13,341 Blog Entries: 5	I didn't know she even had a child...who knocked her up? anyone know?

02-11-2009, 23:01	#15
grahamzxy Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Services: Virgin Media XL , Freeview, Tiscali Broadband Posts: 174	let us all be clear here paps have taken nude photos of a 7 year old child and the posters here take it as an opportunity to slag of the mother. I wonder how said posters would feel if someone photographed & showed their kids naked online for paedophiles to ogle, wonder if they would enjoy being slagged off as a bonus some people

02-11-2009, 23:02	#16
LittleChicken Forum Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: The Chicken Hut Posts: 3,157	Never married him, he asked for a DNA test on the child as he thought it wasn't his. http://www.lukeford.net/profiles/pro...steve_bing.htm As anyone can see he's the spitting image of him. Bing. Damien.

02-11-2009, 23:04	#18
WAKEYLASS Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Wakefield Posts: 2,927	Whilst I agree that the press were bang out of order publishing naked photos of her son in the first place. Is it just me or does anyone else think that her son at 7 years old is a little too old to be running around a beach naked for all to see in the first place? Liz of all people know that if there is a photo opportunity and money to be made, the paps will get it!

02-11-2009, 23:07	#21
Rugby Rose Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: South Staffs/Wolverhampton Services: @rugbyrose Posts: 12,868	I thoroughly disapprove of the printing of the kid naked, I disapprove printing a picture of the child at all, BUT...knowing she gets papped everywhere, including on holiday, especially on the beach - a public place, why was her child naked on the beach? Also 7 is a bit old to be on the beach naked anyway isn't it although I would imagine that's a whole other debate.

02-11-2009, 23:34	#25
Triple-P Forum Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,841	what are grown men doing taking pictures of nude boys?