The Good Kind of Rape
Maybe Whoopi Goldberg, who said of the Roman Polanski case, "I know it wasn't rape-rape," can take a look at this transcript from Polanski's hearing and explain to us which kind of rape this is.
Maybe Whoopi Goldberg, who said of the Roman Polanski case, "I know it wasn't rape-rape," can take a look at this transcript from Polanski's hearing and explain to us which kind of rape this is.
It's perhaps not that shocking that the film world is rallying around Roman Polanski. After all, plenty of artists over the years have worked with Po...
No one is arguing the genius of Roman Polanski, or even the pain and tragedy of his difficult life. But in the end, that has nothing to do with the crime he committed.
Filmmakers, intellectuals, Gen Xers, movie geeks, and meth addicts from across the country and around the world are dismayed by the sentencing of Roger Avary, Oscar-winning co-writer of Pulp Fiction.
It is outrageously offensive to see the outpouring of support for Polanski from the world's elite artist-class. Are there two sets of laws according to these people?
Just because the issue hasn't been in the public eye for the last couple of months, that doesn't mean that the Patriot Act and FISA and illegal wireta...
HuffPost blogger reactions to the arrest of acclaimed film director Roman Polanski have covered the gamut. Scroll down to see the variety of perspect...
The argument that Polanski should not be extradited on grounds of delay would mean that the fugitive who is most successful in eluding capture gains an advantage over one who is less successful.
Roman Polanski plead guilty. He admitted culpability in the civil matter, and the victim received a settlement for an undisclosed sum.
So if it isn't Hitler's skull, does that mean he didn't die in the bunker? Hitler's possible escape, and the theories about his ongoing life in South...
"It was such a terrible movie, we really had no choice," said Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley.
My last post caused a flurry of outraged comments. Though many readers appreciated my essay, many slammed me for what they read as a defense of Polanski through his movies, Repulsion in particular.
I worry about people who are abused who are silent and surrounded by others who continue to blame them for their role as "victims" and perpetrate another painful form of abuse: the malice of ignorance.
Generosity in the Polanski case would be a misplaced generosity. The only person who rightly deserves generosity is the victim, who understandably doesn't want a fresh outbreak of publicity.
It's true we let talented people get away with quite a bit more than the Average Joe in our society. But Roman Polanski shouldn't be able to avoid prison just because he's Roman Polanski.
How naïve of Roman Polanski to think we'd forget that he was a wanted man despite the many films he's made and awards he's won over the last three decades.
Is there really any debate here? Are there really two sides to this story? He raped a child, for Pete's sake.
The Polanski case is not about justice -- that happened years ago. It's about not retraumatizing the survivor. The prosecution should respect her wishes to drop the case.
Arianna was a co-host on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" today and the group discussed a wide range of topics, from the arrest of Roman Polanski to the escalati...
Great Men - and other men - sometimes do find pliant, young flesh irresistible. Geniuses are usually forgiven for it. The arrest of Roman Polanski is a good idea, and should stand. It doesn't matter whether he is a genius.
Given Roman Polanski's history as a persecuted Jew during the Holocaust, I can understand his panicking, skipping bail and fleeing the United States. ...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
This aricle is way off base, because this has nothing to do with liberalism. I have heard conservatives saying Polanski should be left alone.
And this case has nothing to do with Middle American vs. the other parts of America.
Many of us in the other states, California, Washington, New York, to Florida, are outraged at Polanski, and all pedophiles.
Polanski is a ped.ophile, he had sex with other underage girls. He had a sexual affair with Nastassja Kinski when she was only 15 years old. And another underage girl in Europe.
http://www.avert.org/age-of-consent.htm
Where did he do it with Nastassja Kinski? Maybe she was of age at 15. Not every country has such draconian age of consent laws as the U.S. police state.
Nastassja Kinski would be NOBODY if it were not for Roman Polanski. I doubt she would take back her decision to do it with him.
Underage is underage, no matter what country it happens in.
I'm referring to Nastassja Kinski. 15 is legal age in many countries.
Protectionof children may be draconian to you, but to healthy adults it is not.
Children deserve to be shielded from adults' lusts and ego urges.
Where is Kinski now??... ther are more important things than fame.
If I understand the issue correctly,
defendant admitted to crime and was awaiting punishment.
Day before sentencing, the defendant flees to another country.
My question is this - When did he serve his punishment for his admission and conviction of the crime?
I don't think he's served his time (whatever that may be).
As a proud moderate (leans liberal on the social issues, conservative on the financial issues), this guy needs to be returned to the US to serve his sentence. Just like any other person who was convicted of raping a minor.
For those who want to defend his "running away from justice" AND not now having to be returned now that he's in a country that will extradite him, either
1) explain in way that makes sense to you if this were your 15 year old dtr, niece, sister or
2) allow Cheney's henchmen to rendition him for 90 days.
You pick and I'll await to hear your response.
Ok, I'll try one.
My daughter was a slut and is 15% responsible because she was having sex with other guys, and he did pay her lots of money, She suffers no long term ill effects, and he was punished by having to leave the country which was part of his possible sentence anyway, and I don't see what good it will do to end a mans life for something that was done long ago. What good will come out of the extradition? And he is out of the US and is not a risk to other people here. The net result of this will be ...what? Justice? For who ? .
yeah well if you are a moderate I'll eat my hat to quote my dear mother!!
So now we try the case in the media, claim prosecutorial misconduct and drop the case? What is going on in America. The man did a very bad thing. He had intent he plyed the young girl with booze and drugs. Not only did he have intercourse with her but he SODOMIZED her!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is the lowest of the lows and if any one feels this is ok then you should be sent to jail for him and roughed up. To end this debate put POLANSKI's keister in jail and fuggettiabout this. No more debates. He is GUILTY...... GUILTY.... If he walks that every criminal mainly rapist and sodomizer should come up witha lame defense.
"and we are not saved..."
There are worse things he could have done to her. He didn't torture her. He didn't fork her to death.
The "victim" says that the law enforcement agencies that interrogated her did more harm to her than Polanski did. The wishes of the victim matter. She has forgiven him and has asked that the case be dropped.
Yeah...he only gave her qualudes and alcohol. I guess that's ok, right?
Why do you think its ok for criminal behavior to exist in jails? You mention being beat up in jail. Why should that occur? Isn't that a crime too? And for the prisons to allow that to happen, should they be prosecuted and get life jail sentences for allowing that to occur?
"Wells said he overstated his actions to the filmmakers because he was told the documentary would air in France, not the United States."
That's a new one, even for a politician/prosecutor: "I lied because of France."
What a bum. Nice credibility for a highly placed officer of the court.
He doesn't say it was the right thing - he says it was the wrong thing. He made a mistake, wanted some fame, so he told a lie he thought would not be heard here. At least he's man enough to admit the lie, now that it may have a real cost.
good grief...I see alot of outrage about what Polanski did but where is the outrage about what the "officer of the court" did? This has practically ruined a mans life and he just explains that he is the type of guy who cuts to the chase and he is embarrassed!! He should be in jail not Polanski...the nerve of this creep!! Talk about an over inflated ego...and he was advising the judge but was not on the case...now how does that exactly work in an honest courtroom...throw the bum in jail and let Polanski go...he is the victim here!!
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with