The Ten Best Movies About Journalism by Farr
In the wake of the revered Walter Cronkite's passing, I've attempted to isolate the ten best movies about journalism.
In the wake of the revered Walter Cronkite's passing, I've attempted to isolate the ten best movies about journalism.
Senate Majority Leaders Harry Reid says no vote on Obama health care plan until after recess. If ever.
Dan Rather won't let go of his 2007 lawsuit against CBS. There's a reason. He's holding a decent hand, and he's got sticktoitiveness.
Cronkite was so important because he was about the only person in this intensely divided America that both sides could trust. He was our no-frills common bond.
When we lose public figures who become such an enduring part of our private lives, we lose a part of ourselves. We also realize, like Dylan Thomas, that we too, won't go gently into that good night.
As we mourn "the most trusted man in America" we also mourn the kind of television news that no longer exists. Today, the job he perfected has largely lost its relevance.
Although I am sure that Walter Cronkite had friends in politics, he did not give money to political campaigns or actively support candidates. I won't either.
Dowd showed us that the media, in its progression from establishment to grass root, from paper to Apple, has reached the Dowd Nexus and is now irretrievably past the point of no return.
Several years ago, Les Moonves, President of CBS, publically suggested he wanted to "blow up" CBS News. What a sad departure from our golden days. CB...
If "Dow, 30,000 by 2008: Why It's Different This Time" wasn't optimistic enough, there was David Elias' "Dow 40,000: Strategies for Profiting from the Greatest Bull Market in History."
Our lack of attention to international issues could become the prelude to more tragedy around the world. In the next week or so, Uganda will be pulling out all stops to gain a seat on the United Nations Security Council.
Please NBC, let Brokaw resume his status as elder statesmen and reminder to us all of a generation of newsmen who seemed to think that they were better and smarter than their viewers.
Campus Crusade's total revenue for 2006 was $497,516,000. This mega-fundamentalist organization is hardly some rinky-dink little group of religious enthusiasts that's barely capable of running a church.
There was only one Tim Russert, but in selecting a suitable replacement for Meet the Press, in my opinion, there are only two names from which to choose: Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw.
At the National Conference for Media Reform I shed a few tears for the lost honor of my profession -- and for the crumbling integrity of our democracy, knowing that as I wept, other fearless journalists fight on.
McClellan's criticisms about the media been met with denials from TV news anchors. But Dan Rather offered a strong critique of the journalists' performance in his Saturday speech.
Fox News' trash-talking, prime-time headliner is little more than an apologist for those in power -- and especially for his boss Rupert Murdoch.
If the news magazines and newspapers are correct, Katie Couric's career at CBS, much like Dan Rather's, is toast.
One thing you can be sure of, given their past record, with Admiral Moonves at the helm, CBS will be making the wrong decision about Couric's replacement as they smack right into the iceberg.
Until people regain trust in what they read, the long, slow decline will continue regardless of the medium through which information is conveyed.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Mainstream media pure darkness -- Why make it so complicated?
News is a window into reality, unless of course its mainstream news then its a window into fiction, fantasy and fairy tales.
New light that brings us new freedom, or new darkness reinforcing slavery, that is issue when someone offers us what they call news.
We never know what mainstream news is going to hit us with next, but we know it will be new darkness and that we must turn to those with some new light that will force such darkness to give way.
Problem is, our indifferent majority feels it deserves more and with a clear conscience desires only to take more, and any new light that impresses a need to give they reject with a vengeance.
So a law that will bring such a maddening crowd out the darkness they so love -- lots of luck.
That back in the infancy of the broadcast industry, chaos reigned. Different overlapping frequencies, large stations drowning out others across the nation, etc. It wasn't until the government mandated clear rules that broadcasters were able to operate intelligently and compete fairly. Some of those rules required broadcasters to devote a certain percentage of their schedule to public affairs and news programming, as part of their obligation to serve the public.
For many years, radio and TV stations provided news and public information programming as a public service. They felt this civic responsibility keenly. It wasn't until the profit motive kicked in and deregulation was enacted that news began it's long slow slide into stupidity, chasing ratings via senstationalism. Funding was cut, real substantive stories were discarded in favor of attention-grabbing cheap news.
Sometimes we need to operate freely, innovatively. Sometimes we need to follow the rules for the good of all. In this case, we need a return to civic responsibility over profits in the areas of news and public service broadcasting. Let them continue to play 'Big Brother' and all that other crap if they want, if it makes money. But when it comes to news, the highest, indeed the only imperative should be accuracy, truth and service to the public interest. Profit motives should just be removed from the news.
The news people need to hear is give-give-give, but our self-absorbed majority feels they deserve more and only want to take-take-take. Give it up, its a hopeless cause.
Complex yet simple, most perported journalists today are not journalists but gotcha sensationalists. Journalists are people who seek the truth not report wild lies as if its the truth because it causes sensational response by duped people.
Of course! Rather is a real journalist who, at least atttempted, to the detriment of his careeer, ousted by the cowards that be at CBS, has kept up the good fight.!
Kurtz is part of the problem; and, he has a lot of company.
Great column, Josh. It's particularly critical to remind people that public policy in the U.S. has shaped the media since the days when Samuel Morse got a government grant to demo that new telegraph thing.
The radio, TV, and cable industries were strongly influenced by government policies . . . usually prodded by industry lobbyists who have learned to cloak their self-interested agendas in the language of "the public interest."
If today's media institutions are failing in their responsibilities to foster and promote democratic self-government - - and they most certainly are - - a national commission is a great place to start a national dialog about what needs to be done differently. Such a dialog must start with an accurate understanding of the history of government policy making in media and communications, and Howard Kurtz has clearly demonstrated that he doesn't have knowledge or integrity to contribute much to that dialog.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or