kirby3000 said: It's not bullshit. It actually makes total sense. The more you know how a system works, the better you will be able to develop on it. It requires talent and experience. Take a look at early PS2 games and late PS2 games. Seriously, it speaks for itself. Look GTA3 and GTA San Andreas, same system but so much improvement. As time goes by, developers will be able to use more and more of the PS3 power. Remember that it's only 2 years old, we already see a change. I have great hopes that the PS3 has a long life ahead. 10 years sounds good to me. If the beast is as powerful as it's supposed to be, there will be more games like killzone 2 in the near future and even better lookin ones later. They say they use 60% of the PS3 capacity, doesnt mean they dont use the 40% left on purpose. It just mean they dont know how to do it right now. They are giving their opinion on how much they think they are using right now. Like you said, they're hitting the limit yes, the limit of today. Not tomorrow's. I'm amazed you never realized that one console's games generally looks better with time. Now yes, maybe it's not 60%. Maybe it's 70%. Maybe it's 50%. Who knows and who cares? Looking at PS1 and PS2 games evolution, I dont see why PS3 should be any different.
Well said.
[quote=kirby3000] It's not bullshit. It actually makes total sense. The more you know how a system works, the better you will be able to develop on it. It requires talent and experience. Take a look at early PS2 games and late PS2 games. Seriously, it speaks for itself. Look GTA3 and GTA San Andreas, same system but so much improvement. As time goes by, developers will be able to use more and more of the PS3 power. Remember that it's only 2 years old, we already see a change. I have great hopes that the PS3 has a long life ahead. 10 years sounds good to me. If the beast is as powerful as it's supposed to be, there will be more games like killzone 2 in the near future and even better lookin ones later. They say they use 60% of the PS3 capacity, doesnt mean they dont use the 40% left on purpose. It just mean they dont know how to do it right now. They are giving their opinion on how much they think they are using right now. Like you said, they're hitting the limit yes, the limit of today. Not tomorrow's. I'm amazed you never realized that one console's games generally looks better with time. Now yes, maybe it's not 60%. Maybe it's 70%. Maybe it's 50%. Who knows and who cares? Looking at PS1 and PS2 games evolution, I dont see why PS3 should be any different.[/quote]
Well said.
lol he game may not look as good as the E3 2005 trailer\nWTF it looks even better. this trailer sux. still i don't like Killzone 2. just wanted to see this trailer
lol he game may not look as good as the E3 2005 trailer\nWTF it looks even better. this trailer sux. still i don't like Killzone 2. just wanted to see this trailer
Well said.
phahahaha..... the in game in 2009 surpasses this trailer.
phahahaha..... the in game in 2009 surpasses this trailer.
yup
it is amazing now
6 days . . .
phahahaha..... the in game in 2009 surpasses this trailer.
well... kind of... maybe. to a degree.