GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Friday the 13th
New Line Cinema (Warner Bros. Pictures)

Friday the 13th reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 34 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.2 out of 10
based on 29 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 71 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for strong bloody violence, some graphic sexual content, language and drug material

Starring Jared Padalecki, Danielle Panabaker, Aaron Yoo, Amanda Righetti, Travis Van Winkle, and Derek Mears

Welcome back to Crystal Lake in a chilling re-imagining of the classic horror film. Searching for his missing sister, Clay Miller heads up to the eerie woods of legendary Crystal Lake. Against the advice of police and cautions from the locals, Clay pursues what few leads he has in the search for his missing sister, Whitney, with the help of Jenna, a young woman he meets among a group of college kids up for an all-thrills weekend. But they are all about to find much more than they bargained for. Little do they know, they've entered the domain of Jason Voorhees. (New Line Cinema)


GENRE(S): Horror  
WRITTEN BY: Damian Shannon
Mark Swift
 
DIRECTED BY: Marcus Nispel  
RELEASE DATE: Theatrical: February 13, 2009 
RUNNING TIME: 99 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

75
Entertainment Weekly Clark Collis
However, this film is (be)head and shoulders above the recently reanimated likes of "Prom Night" and "My Bloody Valentine."
Read Full Review
60
The New York Times Nathan Lee
There's an itch for this kind of material, and here it is scratched -- to the bone.
Read Full Review
58
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Travis Nichols
The new new new Jason Vorhees, played by Derek Mears in this Michael Bay-produced homage/update of the '80s slasher franchise, is a bit of a fox.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
A surprisingly straightforward romp in slasher-flick cliches, Friday the 13th is replete with gee-whiz gore, gratuitous sex and nudity and party-loving teens with a penchant for ending up on the wrong end of a pick ax.
Read Full Review
50
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
It's business as usual at Camp Crystal Lake, with very little in the way of fresh jolts or an innovative visual style that would have really revitalized the hokey franchise.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
About the best Friday the 13th movie you could hope for. Its technical credits are excellent. It has a lot of scary and gruesome killings. Not a whole lot of acting is required.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Stephen Cole
Despite an evident appetite for mayhem, however, Bay is not the right guy to produce slasher movies. Horror requires intimacy.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Rob Nelson
As in his "Chainsaw" remake, Nispel's scare tactics amount to little more than carefully timed cattle-prod shocks, aided by high-volume speaker blasts that were beyond the budgetary reach of the early '80s films.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Tirdad Derakhshani
Nispel is no Rob Zombie - who achieved something akin to brilliance with his 2007 Halloween remake. What's more, as influential as it's been, Friday the 13th was never that great.
Read Full Review
50
Premiere Staff (Not credited)
Just because it’s less campy doesn't mean the acting isn't awful.
Read Full Review
50
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
This Friday the 13th is glossy, good-looking garbage, acted out by a cast of big-chested androids (male and female alike) and with the original series' rough edges smooved over. It's reasonably entertaining.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Cammila Albertson
It's not an openly meta take on the genre like "Scream," but it's a slasher movie for people who love slasher movies, and if your heart will flutter when a woodchipper casually appears in the first act, it's probably worth watching.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader Cliff Doerksen
It accomplishes what it sets out to do, and if slasher fare is your thing, you've seen far worse.
Read Full Review
42
Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
What damage could Michael Bay inflict on Jason Voorhees that earlier producers hadn't already inflicted on everyone's favorite hockey-masked serial killer? Well, Bay could make Jason Voorhees ... boring.
Read Full Review
40
Empire Kim Newman
Unlucky for almost everyone. It's a sad day when a Friday the 13th remake is shown up by a My Bloody Valentine remake – couldn't they at least have sprung for 3-D?
Read Full Review
40
Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
The question isn't whether Nispel's remake is better than the 1980 original (it isn't) but whether anything original is brought into the mix. And minus a mild plot twist you"ll probably see coming from the first five minutes, there isn't.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Claudia Puig
While it's billed as a "re-imagining" of the horror franchise, this Friday is more like a rehash, delivering just what you expect and nothing more.
Read Full Review
38
Chicago Tribune Christopher Borrelli
This new Friday the 13th, unquestionably savvier and snappier than the original "Friday the 13th," though just as useless, is a needed return to simplicity.
Read Full Review
38
ReelViews James Berardinelli
If all you're looking for is breasts, blood, and gore, this film hits pay dirt. None of the killings are terribly inventive, but they are plentiful, and why bother being devious when axes, machetes, knives, and pointed sticks will do the job just as well?
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Kyle Smith
Is the Crystal Lake PD really doing such a good job? You'd have to go back to Phnom Penh in 1975 to find a place with a higher per-capita rate of unprosecuted homicides.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Dan Zak
Michael Bay is destroying horror films by exhuming the genre's standard-bearers, stripping them of genuine terror, refusing to either re-create faithfully or reimagine boldly, and upping the irony until the original concept stands rigid like a taxidermied grizzly, its teeth bared but its presence, most of all, sad.
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Jim Ridley
This means that for one ticket price, you get three shoddy Friday the 13th movies packed into one, which might constitute entertainment value if any one of them constituted entertainment.
Read Full Review
25
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub
The reboot of the "Friday the 13th" series is a pretty big mess - not particularly scary or interesting or even gory by 21st century movie standards.
Read Full Review
25
The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson
It's almost charming in its sheer lack of ambition, but the lack of creativity in its by-the-numbers shocks is harder to excuse.
Read Full Review
25
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
The movie might have worked if it winked more - or if it played things completely straight.
Read Full Review
20
New York Daily News Staff (Not credited)
Purists will be – happy? Relieved? – to know that the "ch-ch-chhh" music survived, and the body count still totals 13.
Read Full Review
20
Los Angeles Times Mark Olsen
Not fun, louder than it is scary, not even all that gory, this new Friday the 13th has Jason, all right, but otherwise it's missing nearly everything that made the original films work.
Read Full Review
20
New York Magazine David Edelstein
You really have to screw it up to dishonor the memory of a movie as shitty as the original "Friday the 13th." Heads should roll.
Read Full Review
0
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
But bad, this film's so bad! To flub the fans' most beloved butcher boy.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.2 (out of 10) based on 71 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

the truth gave it a1:
"They have entered the domain of jason Vorrhees".... Tjason is pure evil".... etc etc etc Um. He is not the killer in the original firday the 13th and not even a man. The killer is the mother. So, yeah, nice one retards.

Rocky M gave it a9:
This movie restarts the series without changing the storyline. It is the best in the series, and should be enjoyed by any horror movie lover.

jason gave it an8:
Something needs to be made clear. This really is not a horror movie. Jason movies never really have been. Your more likely to hear cheers from the audience than screams. If you want to see oversexed potheads die in fun and interesting ways than you'll enjoy this movie. If you came for giggles you'll enjoy this movie. If you came for fear you will be sorely disappointed. Q.E.D.

Terrman gave it a10:
Now that's entertainment! This movie starts off by despaching all the characters with amazing style in the first 15 minutes - OK, damn short movie, but cool... Well that just setup the plot for the rest of the film which was a blast in the best of the slasher-movie sense. Full-on fun.

Paul C gave it a0:
I've been a fan of horror movies for over 40 years and have learned to take "critics" reviews with the proverbial "grain of salt" I really wasn't interested in seeing this "remake", but after reading what the users were saying I went to see it with good expectations. What a major dissapointment and waste of precious time! I don't understand how so many users on this site could give this crap such positive reviews. This time the critics and user Mike P got it right. Uninspired and pointless indeed! Stay away from and stop supporting garbage like this which insults the intelligence of any and all fans of this genre.

Jeff L gave it a4:
I did not enjoy it as a horror movie. It was empty, really. Jason kills a large number of people. 13 I guess. And he killls them one at a time, and then teleporting to the next destination. There was no real art to this, and i did not hear the "ch-ch-chhh" music, although I hear it was there, I never heard it, which makes me sad.

[Anonymous] gave it an8:
I thought this movie was actually quite enjoyable, much more than the earlier ones that were so bad they were almost comedies, this jason film brings him back with more then just shock and awe, but with an attitude and the real reason to see it isn't just for the nostalgia, it's for slasher film fans to remember why they loved seeing flasher films in the first place.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use