On MP3.com: Free music videos
Sign up | Log in

Log in to post and mark posts as watched.

refresh »
  • [-]any jack & jill parents on? We had a really weird playdate there and just wondering if you like the school.

    12 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    01.22.09, 11:26 AM [ Flag ]
    • I had a very weird play date there a couple of years ago. The director is wacko.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 11:56 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • we actually LOVED the school during our interview and playdate this year! it's probably our FC, though we haven't really talked it through yet. but i can see Jean Leshaw probably isn't everyone's "type" ... she seems like a very strong personality, but we did happen to click with her and like her style (and her school, from what we've been able to see).

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • op: Interesting. Which other schools have you liked? I liked J&J during the interview and tour, it was just the playdate that was odd.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 04:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm a J&J parent, and I've absolutely loved the school (been there many years with my two kids). I'm a huge Jean fan, though I agree with the poster above who says that she isn't necessarily a personality match with everyone. However, she runs a great little school ... J&J is creative, warm, community-minded, down-to-earth, challenging, compassionate. No clue why she would have left in the middle of your playdate (and I agree, it's kind of rude) because she's VERY hands-on about admissions ... it's very out of character, actually.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • op: thanks for your response. I thought she seemed good during our interview but the playdate was just odd. Good to hear you're happy there. Can I ask, are there many Jewish families there? We're Jewish, and Jean made a big deal about asking if we'd feel comfortable and we ended up talking with her for a while about religion, etc. I wonder how much diversity there is there.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 04:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Our experience a couple of years ago too. She is strange and unreadable. We had our son in their playgroup for an entire year, went through the admissions process, playdates and so on. Always had great vibes. Then nothing. Didn't even get wait listed. I have to admit, though you're not supposed to, I took it really personally. We have a second son who we are starting to look at schools for and aren't even applying there. No thanks. Baaaaad feeling.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 05:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Not. Much. It's kind of weird. A big deal is made of its being "non sectarian". Yeah. Right.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 05:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • op: She made a huge point out of how there were all these Jewish families and how comfortable we'd feel! Then she wished us Happy Hanukkah as we were leaving, which was a little bizarre.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 05:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]any good elementary public schools besides PS 6?

    114 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    01.21.09, 06:17 PM [ Flag ]
    • not really - despite what they scream on here.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i heard ps 59 is fabulous. 57th st

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 234, 89, 41, 3, 290, 150....and that's just district 2.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • 3 is crazy. no go. all d-2 but you have to be neighborhood zoned

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.21.09, 06:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • why is it crazy?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.21.09, 06:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • have you been for a visit?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.21.09, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • yes, i thought it was lovely. not for us, but lovely just the same.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.21.09, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • had alot of good features. i would not say lovely...but i see why people like it. for us, way too chaotic, loud, nutty

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.21.09, 06:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • that's not what we experienced on the tour at all. what do you mean by nutty?

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.21.09, 06:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • people loitering in the stairwells, so many parents in the school hallways and classrooms, middle school kids yelling from the windows, like prisoners...

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.21.09, 06:34 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • I have to defend 3 - we go there. It does get messier when you let parents into the school, but I like that. Not fond of the middle school but they do keep them pretty separate. We chose three because dc is very advanced in some ways and at grade level in others. I thought 3 would be better at dealing with that and we've been very happy. I think it's designed to be more child oriented than adult oriented.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 06:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • so you feel that mixing grades address the split levels?

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.21.09, 06:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Teachers are forced to pay attention to the individual's needs I think. It doesn't always work every year for every kid but overall I've seen both my kids benefit from it academically and socially.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 06:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • good to hear. i like your description of it being more child oriented than adult.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:00 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • np. i think 3 is great, but to imply 41 is somehow more "adult-oriented" is just silly and wrong.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:01 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • You're welcome ; ) Oldest dc is in 5th grade there now.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • why do u think 3 is great? 41 feels more right to me. like a proper school? and i am not an uptight person. just questioning academics at 3.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • go with your gut. you are right.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • or: You should go where you feel is right for you. DH liked 41 better because it felt like his suburban elem. I liked 3 better but the deciding factors were 1) our psd's recommendation that 3 would be much better for our particular child, 2) the teachers like 3 and stay there and 3)It's a much smaller school. The academics at 3 are certainly as good as 41. DC is being challenged, scored 4s and is very happy so they must be doing something right. And as far as my referring to 3 as being child oriented that's even in the hand book. That's why they allow controlled noise and skipping in the halls. Adult oriented means a more controlled environment. Not necessarily a bad thing for some people. There are still plenty of rules at 3 btw....

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • well, i would argue that the academics are not as good at 3 and the fact that your dc is scoring well on standardized tests is proof of nothing. what's more, a program that give dcs structure is not "adult-oriented" no matter what your handbook says.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • OK. Please go to 41. I'm sure you'll be very happy there. It's a great school. Standardized testing is not the best measure but it's what we have, and it is used to determine what middle school you go to. Dc is still challenged and happy after 5+years there. That's what's really important to me.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:45 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • no reason to get all huffy. i've done my research and i think that it's disingenous to say that a program with more rigor is somehow geared towards adults. and if test scores aren't your measure of which has better academics, what is?

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Didn't you just state that the tests were "proof of nothing?" Or are you another poster? I don't think 41 has necessarily more academic rigor than 3, at least that's not what I've heard from the parents who have had kids at both. I do think that the teachers vary in their approaches at 3. Is that not true at 41? Teachers do have a lot of autonomy which is why many love it. There are definitely some with higher academic expectations than others.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 08:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • you know people who have one dc at 41 and one at 3?

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 08:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Yes, I've known a couple families over the years we've been there. They felt that each school had something to offer for the child they sent/send there.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 08:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • i know a few parents who have yanked dcs out of 3. i also know a few who were not happy with how unprepared for ms and hs their dc was after attending 3 and in retrospect wish they had chosen 41.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 05:19 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Back at it, eh? And I know people who have left 41 for 3. Are we done now? They are both good schools we're luck to have the choice. Most kids do fine at either I think. I'm still happy with my choice 5 years later and I have no worries that my dc would have been "better prepared" for ms if dc had attended 41. I don't think there's been a comprehensive study. Both schools have many bright kids and good teachers. I'm sure both have some less bright kids and some not so great teachers also. Any prospective family need to talk to many people and tour before they decide to figure out what would be the best match for them. And good night.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 06:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • wow, you're a freak. i'm np and i'm just posting what i've heard from gfs who sent dcs to 3. gl with ms. i guarantee it'll be tougher than you think.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 06:47 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • i have to agree. i love the idea of progressive education, of letting dcs learn through play and not getting bogged down with rules and discipline, but the reality is not pretty! and parents i know whose dcs are older are not so happy with the education dcs got there. but to each her own!

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 07:04 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Anderson, NEST, TAG

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • can someone tell me about TAG? i did not go to open house. if dc tests for citywide, would you suggest this? looked at website and it had no info

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.21.09, 06:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • if you don't have a good zoned option or district-wide. otherwise not worth it imho.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.21.09, 06:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • thx. as opposed to andesron and nest, which you would say are worth it??

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.21.09, 06:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • anderson, definitely. it has a real track record. nest, not so much and i think it is an acquired taste. i personally think there are many schools just as good without the hassle of the commute and the excessive rigor, but many think it is the second-best in the city.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.21.09, 06:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • hmmmm. interesting. if dc got top score, would you put down #! Anderson, TAG as 2nd choice over NEST? people looove their NEST. impossible to get into now, so we hear.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.21.09, 06:32 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP: I have heard very, very positive things about the education at NEST. It might not have the track record of Anderson, but if it's closer to where you live, you should strongly consider it.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.21.09, 06:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • i think it's right for the right dc. if your dc is very focussed, task-oriented, etc., choose nest. otherwise you will be unhappy.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.21.09, 06:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • what if they need "structure" is better when engaged and goes off to la la land during free or choice time?

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 06:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • nest really doesn't tolerate going off into la-la land from what i understand. but i have no first-hand experience.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.21.09, 06:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • he's a typical boy. not wimpy and very playful and fun. if he has a the chance to be the life of the party, put on a show, get rough with his friends...he will go there in a hot second.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 06:52 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • unfortunately, i don't think either nest or anderson caters to this sort of dc.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 06:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • I know kids who are happy there but from what I know and what you say about your child I don't think it would be a good fit. Previous poster who said "dc's who are very focused and task-oriented" has it right. You can send your child to someplace that has structure but you don't want to grind him down. I think Nest while good for some kids is certainly not for all no matter how bright.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 06:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • then what kind of school would you think? i dont want to grind his spirit but he needs to develop healthy work ethics and study habits.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • My kid is in K at Anderson, and the classroom routine matches that description, so far as I can tell. I really don't know about NEST though.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 06:48 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • you'll need a 99 to get into either a or n (high 99 for a). for tag you will only need a 90. so better to rank a, n, tag imo.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.21.09, 06:36 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • good to know. thank u. i LOVED ps130- baxter st in chinatown, beleive it or not. i was shocked at myself. they have a g&t class.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.21.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • so you don't want tag at all if you live that far downtown. if i were you i would rank anderson, nest, 130, 11. unless you really would make the commute, and then throw lower lab into the mix.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 06:46 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • i am hearing great things about new principal at 11. another school that i did not tour thinking it was too ghetto. i should find a way to see just incase.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.21.09, 06:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • the principal is great. we seriously considered the g&t there but felt our (closer) gen ed was just as good. i think it will have a tough time in the era of budget cuts, but the parents are very committed and with luck they will do ok. i would not do gen ed there.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 06:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • hearing about a number of kids leaving corlears and other schools to go to 11 due to finances. im sure its a citywide phenomenon this season. city will have budget cuts but hopefully wealthy relatively speaking) newcomers will compensate.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • no one would leave private school to go to ps11 gen ed unless they were absolutely desperate or unless the school were corlears. i don't see a huge influx of private dollars going into ps11.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.21.09, 07:41 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • Not true. At least 97. It's a citywide.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.21.09, 07:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • true. last year tag accepted dcs with scores as low as 90 in order to fill its classes despite the citywide label.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.21.09, 07:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • That is correct.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 05:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • TAG has 2 classes: one is citywide, one is district. I have pointed this out on UB, but no one has ever demonstrated that the citywide program lowered its criteria below 97.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 06:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • both classes were citywide. they made one district-wide so that they wouldn't really have to admit that they were essentially lowering the bar to get into the school by a full 7 points.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 06:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • There is no high 99. Where the hell do you get your info from? Assignments within a percentile was done through lottery.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 05:21 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • do you know that the area is not the safest? drove by there once in broad daylight, and a homeless person reached out her hand and asked me for money.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 07:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You should tour and see for yourself.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.21.09, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • i did tour all except tag, so looking for opinions. its way up, UES? never went. got burnt out after all of thegazillion tours and live in WV so didnt bother. but if citiwide and GREAT, i would love to know.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.21.09, 06:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ps9, ps87, msc, anderson. all our favorite picks for this year, not necessarily in that order

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Why does ps 40 get no love here? Fantastic school on east 19th st.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Is PS 6 better or PS 290?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • PS 173.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 06:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Where is that?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.21.09, 06:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • 173rd & Fort Washington Ave.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.21.09, 06:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • Oh, okay, I have "talked" with you on UB about your school before. I live up here too, and know the local schools. I'm glad you like the school, but it has some serious issues. But I'm glad it's working out for you.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.21.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • I've returned to visit 173 since (perhaps) you posted it last year as a good school. I'm the Heights native who always remarks that this school isn't somewhere I send my kids, nor recommend to anyone. I'm glad there are people committed and working to make it better but it's nowhere NEAR commendable.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 06:19 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • 116 in murray hill

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.21.09, 07:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • that school seems to have problems these days. g&t being phased out, grumbling by some parents about the school in general, not great doe report card.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.21.09, 07:38 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • search "116 intimates" and in the first post someone listed the actual rankings by math scores (which you can easily look up and compare yourself on insideschools, but I'm not that motivated). You can see that 6 definitely is impressive as the only non G&T (though of course it started as a G&T to get that impressive). But 116 is right behind 6 and that's counting anderson and LL.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.21.09, 07:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • not true, actually. i just checked the doe website.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.21.09, 07:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • interesting. can you give me a link to the data, as I can't find it on doe. did someone in the prior post just make the numbers up?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 10:25 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • np: I suspect people are referring to two different years. Two years ago 116 was right up top, last year, good but not as impressive.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 10:29 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • problems? what school doesn't have problems? that the doe didn't accurately predict the overcrowding is that the school's fault?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 07:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • we had a great experience at 150

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 07:02 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • ps158

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 10:41 AM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I really liked 183.Check it out on insideschools. http://insideschools.org/index12.php?fs=54&str=P.S.%20183%20Robert%20Louis%20Stevenso...&formtype=name

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 03:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • YES! http://nymag.com/urban/guides/family/schools/listings/elementary1.htm

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]depressed, out of work lawyer here, doubting all the choices I made that put me in this situation. 7 years ago, when I had my first child, I stepped off the partnership track and starting doing p/t work from home, 2 days a week. A few years ago, when my kids were a little older, I started "ramping up" again. Last year I took a job in a large firm, 3 days a week, in a field that I hoped would eventually lead to an in-house position. But then the economy tanked, my job ended, and I find myself virtually unemployable. I was just cleaning out some old files and found my tax returns pre-children. I had forgotten how much money I used to make! We can't afford our apartment if I don't eventually find work. I don't need the amount of money I...

    65 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    01.22.09, 11:51 AM [ Flag ]
    • Please understand that it is a really bad time for everyone and no one saw this coming (okay, John Paulson maybe...). I know of FT lawyers that can't find new jobs, people that left firms for investment banks that are getting laid off, and a few women that think being PT at a firm SAVED their jobs. Slowing down to be with your kids and strategizing on how to get an in-house job was really thought out and made a lot of sense.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 12:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Thanks. At the time it really did seem like a good plan! I just hope we can pay our bills until the economy picks up. I think I will need to be open to any kind of job, even a 60 hour a week one, when the economy picks up, and that sucks, but at least I had this time with my kids.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 12:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I hear you and I am also trying to enjoy my kids, be thankful DH currently is working, and toying with the idea of leaving the city (I LOVE it) for somewhere cheaper outside the city. I was laid off from a 4 day a week job and I am pregnant. We have some savings but it's just so ugly out there!

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 12:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • hank paulson?

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • i stayed in the legal field, but ot at a big firm. it kills me to think of my earning potential some days too. i make about what a 2d year associate at biglaw makes. they know nothing and can do nothing.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 12:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP here -- I would be thrilled to get a job paying what a 2nd year makes -- they make so much more now than when I was in it full-time, even first years make more than I made (at a big firm) when I left after 6 years! But there are just no jobs right now. There is nothing to even apply for. It's really scary out there!

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 12:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • well, its possible i'm only making first year money by now. what is your specialty?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 12:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • for most of my career I was a litigator, but my last job (the one I was hoping would lead to an in-house job) was in finance regulation.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 02:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • welcome to the new world. I left a successful architecture firm to take off 18 months with my son. The week I was making plans to return, the company lost it three top clients and has since has two rounds of layoffs. You can't blame your decisions, everyone is in a similar boat after making diverse decisions.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 12:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • How about looking for a job with Lexis or Thomson Reuters? They love to hire JDs and you can do okay if the position is commission based.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 12:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Also Law School admissions, career counseling, etc. Good jobs, less stess/hours. Also there are a lot of law schools in NYC.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 12:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • commission based jobs are making NO money in this economy. you can't sell products/services to law firms right now. They are all cutting back on this stuff now.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Can you take the bar in a second state? Then you can get more work. My friends started doing this and it helped.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:30 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • have you looked at temp agencies? like axiom legal.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Yes, I have, and the only jobs the temp agencies have are low level document review work -- lots of hours for like $30/hr. It's entry level work for people who couldn't get a job when they graduated from law school.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • there are web sites that post available contracts for attorneys.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I have looked at a lot of sites and they have nothing right now. Are there any in particular that you are thinking of? The only jobs I see now are for people with very specific qualifications (like fluent in Thai).

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Count your blessings...you're much better off then people in finance that have been let go! Even if only being paid $30 an hour for document review, that's better than nothing!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 02:44 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • If it's that little, she might as well be a nanny. Some are getting paid more than that.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • actually, after paying taxes, baby sitter, and the general cost of working (dry cleaning, transportation, convenience meals etc.) it doesn't make sense to take a job like that. And if I did, I couldn't put it on my resume b/c it would hurt my chances of getting a regular associate job.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 02:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • Sitting on your ass and being out of work is better for the resume than doing honest legal work?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 02:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • legal head hunter here -- she is right. Doc review attornies are a whole separate group and once you have done that work, firms won't touch you for a regular associate job. Taking those jobs does make you unemployable for the type of work it sounds like this mom used to do.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 03:02 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • That's just stupid. Honest work is honest work -- we all have to make a living. Would it be better for the law resume for her to be a hooker?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 03:06 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • it may be stupid, but it's reality. a lot of the thinking of hiring partners at law firms is stupid, imho.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 03:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • NP: I don't think it's unique to law either. Taking a job that's way below your experience and ability level will hurt your career prospects, even if the very reasonable explanation for you taking it was that you were desperate for cash.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 03:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • NNP -- yes, I have seen a lot of bad job advice on this board along the lines of "any job is better than no job." It's just not true. Looking for a career job is a full time job and you can't do it while you are employed in a crappy job that you can't put on your resume.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 03:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • You're right. It's so much better to NOT work and let the bank foreclose on the house while you're looking for a job that's not there.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.22.09, 03:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • the op never said they were going to lose their home! she said she was depressed about the choices she made with her career, and your telling her to take a job that will surely not help that situation.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 03:50 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • What part of "we can't afford our apartment if I don't eventually find work" did you not understand?

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 03:55 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Why does it make you "unemployable"? Is it unethical work? Is it like how reporting for the National Enquirer will blackball you from ever working for the "legitimate" media? Or is it that somehow doing that kind of law work makes all of your previous law experience and education somehow leak out of your ass?

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 03:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • Those who do the hiring view it as work for people who just aren't very bright. It is just impossible to get them to see that there are varying reasons people chose to take these jobs. Most firms won't even look at the resume of someone who did temp work at all, even if it's high end temp work. If they see doc review on the resume, there isn't a chance in hell they will interview this mom. Honestly, in this economy, they won't look at the resume of anyone who took any time off at all, so this mom is totally screwed until the economy takes a drastic upturn.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 03:23 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • She doesn't have to put it on her resume.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 03:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • but isn't that just going to make her more depressed? She won't be with her kids (those jobs often require working 6-7 days a week) and she will make 30% of what she made right out of lawschool!

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 03:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • They certainly will not look at such a resume when it is presented to them by a headhunter who charges them a hefty amount and therefore should deliver candidates with spotless resumes. If she needs money, then she needs money. When this economic storm passes, she may not be able to avail herself of a headhunter's services, but she can network like hell, using her contacts from big firm days in order to get herself back into that life.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 07:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • OP posted that she is depressed about basically tanking her career and your advice is to take a job that is below the type of job she had over a decade ago when she graduated law school? Don't you think that will just make her more depressed?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 03:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • You're right. What were we thinking. Let's just blow smoke up her ass and tell her that Eric Holder is stepping aside so she could be the next Attorney General!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 03:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • I'm sorry, if I were on the verge of not being able to afford my apartment, I would take a job as a barista at Starbuck's if I had to! In this economy, I think people should give a little on their sense of entitlement. Eventually she might be forced to!

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 03:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • OP here -- if I take a job that won't leave me any money after paying taxes and babysitter, it won't help me keep my apartment. I will lose my apartment and never see my kids. I honestly don't see how that helps. If that's the only job I can get, we'll move to the burbs. Which is fine, btw. But it doesn't stop me from being depressed that I could easily be making $300K+ if I hadn't make the choices I made. Taking a job paying $60K, which is $40K after taxes, and then paying a nanny $32K just doesn't make any economic sense to me.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 03:54 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • Oh boo hoo. I could be crying about not carrying through with my dream of being a baseball player making $35 million. But we make choices. Get over it.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 03:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • Wow, I have to say, the YBMOM folks were much more helpful!!

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 03:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • What do you want from us? We gave you suggestions.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.22.09, 03:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • well, on YB MOM a lot of women talking about the benefits of the choices I made and about how even if I had stayed the course I may well find my self out of work now any way and how there aren't jobs even for those with perfect credentials. No one said take a really crappy job that won't pay the mortgage anyway, which, I'm sorry, is just really bad career advice.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 04:03 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • Well perhaps you need to lose the big mortgage and downsize so you can take a job that WILL pay the bills. Clearly, you are not employable at the level you are currently living.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 04:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • Unless you actually were a pro ball player, it's not the same as the OPs situation at all.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 03:59 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Don't look back with regret, for you do not know what would have happened if you stayed on the partnership track in your old firm. What percentage of folks made partner and of that percentage, how many were female? Might want to downsize or start thinking about downsizing and/or changing your career altogether. Great book out there, "What you CAN do with a law degree," which will give you some ideas on how to use your skills as a lawyer in other avenues of work. And, if you can swing it financially, think about a career with the feds as an attorney, where the starting salaries are somewhat higher than state or local government, benefits greater, and salary increases at a steady pace. And, as many folks here have said, do what you can ...

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 05:14 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • OP -- thank you for your thoughtful post (although the end got cut off so I think I missed some of your advice)

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 05:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Hi, I feel for you! im FT lawyer at big firm. dont really like it, but pay is good. i have baby and often wish i could go part time, but know once i go that route, its all over... have u thought of temping -- that often leads to a full time job.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 05:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • Haven't you been reading the thread? Temping turns you into a leper and your law degree into a piece of $hit, apparently. You'd be better off just throwing yourself in front of a downtown A express train.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 05:33 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • well, if the only temp jobs pay $30/hr, you are better off staying home. After taxes, childcare etc., she won't take home any money.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 07:08 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I have done temp jobs in the past, but the agencies I have worked with say they have no work for people with years of experience now, just doc review stuff.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 07:05 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I'm a govt lawyer, and I realize that these jobs are hard to get, but is there any way that you could position yourself for one? Look at where the fed govt is putting its money. If you have any kind of financial-services related expertise, maybe you could aggressively seek out those opportunities?

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 05:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I would love a government job. I have been looking on all the sites that list them and I applied to one at the NY Fed but so far that is the only one I have found. There are really no jobs right now. I hope the governement jobs will pick up before the private sector.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 07:07 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
  • [-]WWYD? I am Jewish, raising my son in the Jewish faith (he goes to a Hebrew pre-K). His nanny, a devout Christian is an excellent caregiver and has been with us two years. My ds was singing a Jesus song this morning, and I almost had a heart attack. I do not know how to approach this with her, as she has a right to sing whatever she wants, and I don't want to make her fell bad or wrong, but I don't want her teaching my son about Christ, thank you.

    56 replies [ Reply | Watch | Options ]
    01.22.09, 06:08 PM [ Flag ]
    • How do you know he got it from her? And if she's just harmlessly singing her own tunes, she can't help that your kid is repeating her.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • lol. sorry.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:09 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • If that bothers you find a jewish caregiver

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • no, that's not fair - she is a good cargiver, I want to keep her, but I need to know how to approach this with her without insulting her.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • What "Jesus" song? My Christian kid knows more "jewish" songs than some of our friends who keep kosher. It's New York!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:10 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • something with violins? I don't know, I just heard Jesus come out of his mouth and that was it for me,

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • jesus and violins? ok, now i know you're just pulling our leg. nice try, cnet slob. aren't there some cool ranch doritos you need to rip into right about now?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 06:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • no, I swear, he was saying, "vavavavav and then jesus" and I asked "wgat did you say" he said "the violins" and then I said "what came after that" and he said "jesus"

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 06:31 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • then how do you know he was "praising jesus"? you're a big fat jew liar.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 06:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I never said he was "praising" Jesus, you ignorant bigot.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 06:37 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • "funny, I have no problem with him hearing or learning Christmas songs, but his praising Jesus made me extremely uncomfortable. it is against our faith, considered a form of idolatry." [

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 06:39 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • np: you can't assume that that response was OP. do you know how UB works?

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • so there are two posters with ds learning jesus songs from his nanny? oh, and the way ub works is if you are a new poster, you begin your post with "np."

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.22.09, 06:42 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • I stand corrected (but you're still an ignorant bigot).

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 06:43 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • lol. you stand corrected? as in you can't remember from one minute to the next what you actually posted? i'm thinking maybe you can't really remember if the nanny was singing jesus songs at all. troll.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.22.09, 06:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • I'm sorry if my Mensa brain isn't working as well as yours tonight, and I couldn't remember exactly what I had said a few moments earlier. amazing that you, on the other hand, can. you should join the circus.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 06:56 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                        • you can't remember if your dc was actually praising jesus or not. the entire point of your post, in other words. you are an idiot.

                          [ Reply | Options ]
                          01.22.09, 06:58 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                      • p.s. if you think it's a fake, then move on, troll.

                        [ Reply | Options ]
                        01.22.09, 06:57 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • good luck sheltering ds from jesus in this country honey.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • that's exactly my conflict. I don't want to shelter him. I want him to be exposed to various cultures and religions, but I also want him to develop a strong identity with his heritage, and at this age, I don't want him becoming confused.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • NP: Mountain meet molehill.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 06:18 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • so I should just let it go?

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 06:21 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • YES... ds is just singing a song... dont overthink it

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 06:29 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • I know that in his mind it is no different than singing "Old McDonald," but according to our religion, it isn't kosher, so to speak. but then, I've done other things that aren't kosher - I was hoping he'd have a clean start.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 06:40 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • you sound just plain stupid. every year, my dc comes home singing the dreidel song. we are christian, but like that he gets exposure to other cultures/religions. I would never say "we don't believe what jewish people believe, and we don't believe in dreidels or sing jewish songs" You are just too feaky about all this. Religion is one thing. stupid interpretations of religious ideas is another.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 06:53 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • I don't think the fact that his baby sitter is a different religion than his family will confuse him. May I jump to a conclusion and guess she may be a different race too?

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 06:27 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Cheese and Rice! This is terrible!

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Nothing wrong with his learning about Jesus. Jesus was indeed a great man with a great following who existed. The difference is that "we don't believe he was the savior", or something like that "while some people do". No big deal here! Good chance to begin enlightening him about differences.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:13 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • that's pretty much what I said to him. that every one believes in different things, and we don't believe in jesus, and we don't sing jesus songs in our home.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:15 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • And don't forget to point out that the Jews killed him by nailing him to a cross ...

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:16 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • ITA. I was upset at first that the only holiday song DD seemed to have learned at preschool was "Dreidel, dreidel, dreidel, I made it out of clay . . ." (we're Christians). But after much thought, I decided to chalk it up to living in NYC -- we all have to learn to expose our kids to different cultures/faiths, while still instilling our own.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • funny, I have no problem with him hearing or learning Christmas songs, but his praising Jesus made me extremely uncomfortable. it is against our faith, considered a form of idolatry.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 06:24 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • Oh dear Lord. Don't you think that there is an innocent explanation here, that nanny was singing the song in the presence of your son, while performing her job duties, and he naturally picked up on it? Sheesh. I highly doubt that this is evidence of your nanny prosletyzing.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
      • I am an educator. I know that a song needs to be repeated for a 3yo to pick it up. maybe not proselytizing, but he doesn't need to be exposed to that at home.

        [ Reply | Options ]
        01.22.09, 06:20 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
        • You are clearly very threatened by this. I am raising my dd Catholic, and yet she attended Jewish preschool. There was never any confusion that I could discern. When she asked if we could celebrate Passover, I just simply explained that we're not Jewish so we don't celebrate that, but it sure looks like a nice holiday, doesn't it? You really need to relax a little, and have some faith in your own ability to raise your dc.

          [ Reply | Options ]
          01.22.09, 06:22 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
          • you are right - I am threatened by it for some reason (that will be a conversation for my therapist, not UB. thanks for the advice. I do need to have more faith in myself.

            [ Reply | Options ]
            01.22.09, 06:26 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
            • Let me clarify: I can't really say that my dd was not confused. Maybe she was. The point I was trying to make was that she was able to somehow live with the inconsistency (her preschool had Jewish themes, yet occasionally when she asked about why we as a family didn't celebrate those holidays, I told her flatly that we're not Jewish). I think kids are capable of mroe than we give them credit for. At a young age, I just don't think it's an issue. When they're older, then that's a different situation and you would handle it differently.

              [ Reply | Options ]
              01.22.09, 06:28 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
              • maybe I just need to handle the jesus thing the way I handle the santa thing.

                [ Reply | Options ]
                01.22.09, 06:35 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                • np - I totally get your feeling - I would have felt the same way if our kid was picking up Jesus songs from our nanny. And I would have tried to find some tactful way to say something.

                  [ Reply | Options ]
                  01.22.09, 07:11 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                  • thank you.

                    [ Reply | Options ]
                    01.22.09, 07:12 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
                    • There must be some tactful way to say this - maybe say that people will say something to him at school about it if he sings that song, he's too young to really understand that people have different religions and that you don't want to have to have the conversation with him that his nanny that you all adore is different from him somehow.

                      [ Reply | Options ]
                      01.22.09, 07:17 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
    • I don't think it's a big deal. My kid is obsessed with Hanukah and obviously I can't even spell it. One of the other Moms at her preschool came in over the holidays and did a Hanukah presentation and that really stuck! FWIW, they invite any/everyone to come in and present on various stuff. I promised her I would ask my jewish friends if we could come over to their houses during Hanukah for a "Hanukah Party" - her words.

      [ Reply | Options ]
      01.22.09, 06:25 PM [ Flag | link to this post ]
refresh »

Your settings system defaults

Stages
Regions
Select all

Log in to save selected filters as your default.

Numbers in parentheses are the number of posts in that category.

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

Boards Help

Abbreviations
More Boards Help

Site Feedback Thank you for your feedback about the new site. We are paying close attention to your comments and we will incorporate them as we make improvements to the site. Please continue to report problems and offer feedback on the Site Feedback Board and visit our Site Talk blog for answers to some of your questions and updates on specific issues.