This item has been officially peer reviewed. Print this Encyclopedia Page Print This Section in a New Window This item is currently being edited or your authorship application is still pending. View published version of content View references for this item

Analysis

Authored By: P. F. Hessburg, K. M. Reynolds, R. E. Keane, K. M. James, R. B. Salter

Fire danger evaluation (Table: Logic outline) for all subwatersheds in the study area (figureĀ at right) was performed with the NetWeaver logic engine (Miller and Saunders 2002) in EMDS (Reynolds and others 2003). Continuous data related to recent burns in map zone 16 were not available and were not implemented in this version of the fire danger model. This component should be added as data become available. Priority setting for fuels treatments among subwatersheds was performed with Priority Analyst, an engine for running Criterium DecisionPlus models in EMDS.


Click to view citations... Literature Cited

Encyclopedia ID: p3641



Home » Environmental Threats » Case Studies » Case Study: Evaluating Wildland Fire Danger and Prioritizing Treatments » Methods » Analysis


 
Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Text Size: Large | Normal | Small