Print this Encyclopedia Page Print This Section in a New Window This item is currently being edited or your authorship application is still pending. View published version of content View references for this item

Treatment Options And Known Effectiveness

Authored By: P. R. Robichaud

The USDA Forest Service and other land management agencies have spent tens of millions of dollars on postfire emergency watershed stabilization measures intended to minimize flood runoff, peakflows, onsite erosion, offsite sedimentation, mud and debris flows, and other hydrologic damage to natural habitats as well as roads, bridges, reservoirs, and irrigation systems (General Accounting Office 2003). Determining the effectiveness and limitations of rehabilitation treatments is essential if cost-benefit analysis is used for making treatment decisions.

BAER treatments include:

The majority of information on BAER treatments focuses on hillslope treatments -- including mulching, seeding, and building erosion barriers -- which are regarded as a first line of defense against postfire erosion and unwanted sediment deposition. In addition, more research has been done, and is being done, on the development and evaluation of hillslope treatments than on channel or road treatments (Robichaud and others 2000).


Subsections found in Treatment Options And Known Effectiveness

Click to view citations... Literature Cited

Encyclopedia ID: p289



Home » So. Fire Science » Wildfire » Wildland Fire Rehabilitation and Restoration » Postfire Rehabilitation » Treatment Options And Known Effectiveness


 
Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Text Size: Large | Normal | Small