This item has been officially peer reviewed. Print this Encyclopedia Page Print This Section in a New Window This item is currently being edited or your authorship application is still pending. View published version of content View references for this item

Methods to Assess Landscape-Scale Risk of Bark Beetle Infestation to Support Forest Management Decisions

Authored By: T. L. Shore, A. Fall, W. G. Riel, J. Hughes, M. Eng

The objective is to provide practitioners with suggestions on how to select appropriate methods for risk assessment of bark beetle infestations at the landscape scale in order to support their particular management decisions and to motivate researchers to refine novel risk assessment methods. Methods developed to assist and inform management decisions for risk assessment of bark beetle infestations at the landscape scale have been diverse, ranging from simple empirical correlations to complex systems models. These approaches have examined different bark beetle species, forest types and systems, and management questions, and they differ in spatial and temporal precision, the types of processes included, and the form of output. Bark beetle risk assessment methods, however, share a common theme: they aim to quantify expected levels of attack and loss due to beetles. By focusing on this commonality, presented here is a gradient in which methods can be classified and ranked, ranging from more structural, pattern-oriented methods to more functional, process-oriented methods. The objective is to describe a framework for comparing methods in terms of how risk is represented and in terms of the complexity of application. To illustrate how diverse methods can be cast within a common frame of reference, brief examples are provided of four types of methods that we have used in British Columbia, Canada, to examine landscape-scale risk of mountain pine beetle attack in lodgepole pine forests. Then provided is some guidance on how to select an appropriate method for a given system and set of questions. The most appropriate method is the simplest one that can address the questions, minimize uncertainty, and inform the decision process in the required timeframe. It is important that researchers and practitioners can view bark beetle risk-assessment methods as a toolkit and to select appropriate tools for a given task, as no single method is best for all situations.


Subsections found in Methods to Assess Landscape-Scale Risk of Bark Beetle Infestation to Support Forest Management Decisions
  • Introduction : A variety of risk assessment tools have been designed to help managers quantify expected losses from bark beetles, losses which can be quite severe.
  • Risk-Assessment Methods : This section provides information and example applications for categorizing risk methods, susceptibility/risk rating systems, graph-based connectivity assessments, empirical outbreak projections, population modeling, and other risk-assessment methods.
  • Discussion : In this section, information is provided for use in selecting an appropriate method of risk assessment, a discussion is provided on model verification and validation, and future research needs in this area are discussed.
  • Conclusion : A common framework is presented within which methods to assess landscape-scale risk of bark beetle infestations can be classified.

Encyclopedia ID: p3245



Home » Environmental Threats » Pests/Biota » Native » Landscape-Scale Risk of Bark Beetle Infestation


 
Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Text Size: Large | Normal | Small