Authored By: K. McPherson
Vegetation
Surface fires typically
leave cypress unharmed (citations in
Wade et al. 1980), especially where cypress can root at least partially in mineral soil or where peat soils do not ignite (
Ewel and Mitsch 1978). Bald cypress is known to be very tolerant of fire with only longleaf pine, slash pine and loblolly being more tolerant given similar bark thickness (
Hare 1965). Though fire tolerance of pond cypress was not systematically compared with bald cypress, the bark of pond cypress tends to be thicker and shaggier than that of bald cypress suggesting that it may be even more fire tolerant than bald cypress (
Ewel 1998).
Cypress is known to
sprout epicormically when branches are killed by fire and
coppice following cutting and burning where above ground stems were killed (
Ewel and Mitsch 1978).
Cypress coppice, however, are often killed by fire (
Ewel 1995).
Severe
ground fires can kill mature cypress trees particularly when growing on deep peat (
Ewel and Mitsch 1978). If cypress is not killed by a severe ground fire, the tree can be wounded leading to fungal infection and heart rot
(Ewel 1995). Heart rot may contribute to tree cavity development. Furthermore, some ground fires that do not cause direct mortality may contribute to secondary mortality from windthrow by consuming soil and roots that function to anchor trees.
There is some suggestion that fires may stimulate cone production in cypress, but further investigation is needed to confirm this (
Ewel 1995).
A combination of fires and hydrologic regimes limits
hardwoods within cypress wetlands. Hardwoods are generally recognized as being less tolerant of fire than cypress (
Hare 1965). In one study, hardwoods suffered more mortality than cypress after a wild fire (
Ewel and Mitsch 1978). This suggests that frequent fires play a role in limiting hardwoods within pond cypress wetlands.
Little research has been done specifically on the effects of fire frequency or season on
shrubs in cypress wetlands. The role of fire frequency, season and intensity in controlling hardwoods and shrubs in
upland systems is relatively well studied. In general, very frequent fires (annual) in the growing season are most effective at reducing hardwoods and shrubs in upland systems. Many of the shrubs and hardwoods studied in various upland systems such as flatwoods and pine savannahs are the same shrubs that occur in pond cypress wetlands. In addition, observations of fire practitioners suggest that frequent fires may be important in reducing shrubs in wetlands. For instance,
Ferguson (1998) observed that growing season fires applied in the
Apalachicola National Forest had the effect of reducing titi (
Cyrilla racemiflora, Cyrilla parviflora and Cliftonia monophylla) and opening the transitions to wetlands. In examining aerial photography,
Huffman and Blanchard (1991) observed that woody plants invaded wetlands after a period of fire suppression, and after reintroducing fires under droughty conditions, noted that hardwoods appeared to decrease. Literature on
herbaceous bogs also suggests that frequent fire maintains them as such and the absence of fire promotes shrubby systems (reviewed in
Harper et al. 1998). However, recent studies in
shrub bogs and
marshes suggests that fires do not decrease shrub density, but frequent fires can eliminate recruitment into new areas and thus maintaining shrub free zones (
Olsen and Platt 1995,
Drewa et al. 2002a,
2002b) and frequent or lightning season fires may decrease the cover of shrubs (
Lee et al. in press,
Lee et al. In prep)
Similar to upland systems, the abundance of
herbaceous plants including many
rare plants is dependent on fire regime. An open canopy in cypress domes has been correlated with greater abundance of grasses and sedges (
Marios and Ewel 1983). Fire with the hydrologic regime are important in keeping canopies open and limiting shrub layers of cypress wetlands thus eliminating competition for herbaceous species. The number of rare plant species found there demonstrates the importance of fire in maintaining an herbaceous wetland margin.
The process of
frequent fire may have been important in
limiting organic soil buildup and peat accumulation, especially in more shallow wetlands by removing plant debris that would otherwise accumulate as peat (
Kirkman et al. 2000, Schalles et al. 1989).
Animals
There has been little study of the direct effects of fire on wildlife inhabiting domes; however, a growing body of literature is beginning to implicate the indirect effects of
fire suppression on vegetation in and around wetlands in declines and changes animal populations, particularly amphibian populations (
Russell et al. 2002). Canopy closure due to invading hardwoods and an increase in shrub dominance in the absence of fire (see plant response) affects animal species composition and abundance.
Wading birds appear to prefer permanent water, large diameter trees, sparse hardwoods and an open understory (
Harris and Vickers 1984). Several
amphibian species including the pig frog, striped newt and flatwoods salamander utilize seasonally flooded grassy ecotones for foraging or breeding (
Hart and Newman 1995,
Palis 1996,
Franz and Smith 1999). Canopy closure of wetlands historically used by the federally endangered
Mississippi gopher frog is one of the factors cited in many wetlands becoming unsuitable breeding sites (
USFWS 2001). Canopy closure in wetlands has decreased the abundance of some species of amphibians and has been correlated with extinctions of others (
Werner and Glennemeier 1999,
Skelly et al. 1999). Several Federally listed amphibians such as the
flatwoods salamander and the
Mississippi gopher frog; a candidate for listing, the
striped newt; and regionally rare species such as the Dusky gopher frog and the
Florida gopher frog utilize habitats maintained by frequent fires. All species utilize upland habitats in stages of their life cycles, but breed in small, ephemeral wetlands including cypress dominated wetlands (
Johnson 2000,
Palis 1996,
Franz and Smith 1999). Habitat loss due to modification by agriculture, forestry operations or other uses is the largest threat cited for all species. However, where suitable habitat remains, much of it has been degraded by fire suppression in both uplands and wetlands (
Palis 1996,
USFWS 1999,
USFWS 2001,
Johnson 2000,
Franz and Smith 1999).
The role of frequent fire in maintaining herbaceous plants is particularly important for these amphibian species. Grassy wetlands, with an open canopy are critical for
flatwoods salamander and gopher frog reproduction. Gopher frogs use emergent vegetation for deposition of eggs and larval flatwoods salamanders utilize herbaceous vegetation for cover and for foraging (
USFWS 2001,
Palis 1996). Maintenance of the grassy nature of the wetland particularly the ecotone requires frequent early lightning season fires to prevent shrub invasion (
USFWS 2001). Less is known of the biology of the striped newt; however, it tends to persist only in frequently burned habitats (
Johnson 2001). It appears that herbaceous vegetation in wetlands and uplands is important in this species’ life cycle. Placement of
firebreaks around wetlands can lead to detrimental changes in these species habitats.
- Drewa P.B., W. J. Platt, and E. B. Moser. 2002a. Fire effects on respouting of shrubs in headwaters of southeastern longleaf pine savannas. Ecology. 83(3): 755-767.
- Drewa P.B., W. J. Platt, and E. B. Moser. 2002b. Community structure along elevation gradients in headwater regions of longleaf pine savannas. Plant Ecology. 160: 61-78.
- Ewel, K. C. 1998. Pondcypress Swamps. In: M. G. Messina and W. H. Conner. Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management. Boca Raton, FL, USA.: Lewis Publishers.
- Ewel, K. C. and W. J. Mitsch. 1978. The effects of fire on species composition in cypress dome ecosystems. Florida Scientist. 41: 25-30.
- Ewel, K.C. 1995. Fire in Cypress Swamps in the Southeastern United States. In: S.I. Cerulean and R. T. Engstrom , eds. Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proceedings Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference. No. 19. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research, Inc.: 111 -116.
- Franz, R., and L.L. Smith. 1999. Distribution and status of the striped newt and Florida gopher frog in peninsular Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Final Report, Tallahassee, FL: 46 + vi p.
- Furguson, J. P. 1998. Prescribed fire on the palachicola Ranger District: the shift from dormant season to growing season and the effects on wildfire suppression. In: T. L. Pruden and L. A. Brennan , eds. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No 20. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 120-126.
- Hare, Robert C. 1965. Contribution of bark to fire resistance of Southern Trees. Journal of Forestry. 63(4): 248-251.
- Harper, M., A-M. Trame, and M.G. Hohmann. 1998. Management of Herbaceous Seeps and Wet Savannas for Threatened and Endangered Species. USACERL Technical Report 98/70 April 1998.
- Harris, L. D. and C. R. Vickers. 1984. Some faunal community characteristics of cypress ponds and the changes induced by perturbation. In: K. C. Ewel and H. D. Odum. Cypress Swamps. Gainesville, FL: University Presses of Florida: 171-185.
- Hart, R. and J. R. Newman. 1995. The Importance of Isolated Wetlands to Fish and Wildlife in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Program project NG88-102. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
- Huffman, J. M. and S. W. Blanchard. 1990. Changes in woody vegetation in Florida dry prairie and wetlands during a period of fire exclusion, and after dry-growing season fire. In: S. C. Nodvin and T. A. Aldrop , eds. Fire and the Environment: Ecological and Cultural Perspectives. General Technical Report SE-69. Asheville, NC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeast Forest Experiment Station: 75-83.
- Johnson, D.W., B.A. Hungate, P. Dijkstra, G. Hymus, C.R. Hinkle, P. Stiling, and B.G. Drake. 2003. The Effects of Elevated CO2 on Nutrient Distribution in a Fire-adapted Scrub Oak Forest. Ecological Applications. 13: 1388-1399.
- Johnson, E.A., and K. Miyanashi. 2001. Forest fires: behavior and ecological effects. San Diego: Academic Press. 13-26, 80, & 594 p.
- Kirkman, L. K., P. C. Goebel, L. West, M.B. Drew, and B. J. Palik. 2000. Depressional wetland vegetation types: a question of plant community development. Wetlands. 20(2): 373-385.
- Lee, M. A., K.J. Ponzio, and B. G. Ormiston. 1995. Fire effects and fire management in the upper St. Johns River basin marsh, Florida. In: S.I. Cerulean and R. T. Engstrom , eds. Fire in wetlands: a management perspective. Proceedings Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference No. 19. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research, Inc.: 142-150.
- Marois, K.C. and K. C. Ewel. 1983. Natural and management-related variation in cypress domes. Forest Science. 29: 627-640.
- Olsen, M.S. and W. J. Platt. 1995. Effects of growing season fires on resprouting of shrubs in longleaf pine savannas. Vegetatio. 119: 101-118.
- Palis, J. G. 1996. Element stewardship abstract: Flatwoods salamander (Ambystoma cingulatum Cope). Natural Areas Journal. 16(1): 49-54.
- Russell, K. R., D. C. Guynn Jr. and H. G. Hanlin. 2002. Importance of small isolated wetlands for herpetofaunal diversity in managed, young growth forests in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Forest Ecology and Management. 163: 43-59.
- Schalles, J.F., R.R. Sharitz, J. W. Gibbons, G.J. Leversee and J. N. Knox. 1989. Carolina Bays of the Savannah River Plant. SRO-NERP-18. 18-70 p.
- Skelly, D. K., E. E. Werner, and S. A. Cortwright. 1999. Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology. 80: 2326-2337.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida multi-species recovery plan. Atlanta, GA: 2,172 p.
- USFWS. 2001. Mississippi Gopher Frog Distinct Population Segment of Dusky Gopher Frog as Endangered. Federal Register. 66(233): 62993-63002.
- Wade, D., J. Ewel and R. Hofstetter. 1980. Fire in South Florida Ecosystems. Gen, Tech. Rep. SE-17. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC.
- Werner, E. E. and K. S. Glennemeir. 1999. Influence of forest canopy cover on breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia. 1-12.