This item has been officially peer reviewed. Print this Encyclopedia Page Print This Section in a New Window This item is currently being edited or your authorship application is still pending. View published version of content View references for this item

Step 3 - Risks and Threats to Native Trout Populations and Associated Stream-Riparian Habitats

Authored By: K. Overton, A. D. Carlson, C. Tait

Extinction risks for salmonids are influenced by complex and interacting factors that are often difficult, if not impossible, to identify and measure. Despite this difficulty, understanding the nature of the extinction process and the characteristics of local fish populations and habitats can lead to management prescriptions that minimize risks. Relative extinction risks include deterministic, stochastic, and genetic factors at several spatial and temporal scales (Rieman and others 1993). The risk portion of step 3(A-C) (figure at right) was generated for cutthroat trout by agency biologists through application of an extinction risks matrix (Rieman and others 1993) that matched population characteristics, such as size, isolation, and survival rates, with a variety of environmental and demographic parameters. The outcome was an estimate of relative risk of extinction (low to extreme) for trout in a given reach, subwatershed, or across a subbasin. For the Central Bear River subbasin, step 3(A) maps extinction risks in subwatersheds based on trout population size and isolation, respectively.

The persistence of trout populations in a subwatershed can be threatened by land use practices such as grazing, fire suppression, mining operations, recreational activities, road construction, dams and water diversions, and introduction of invasive species. Threats to fish populations or their habitat may be direct, as in the alteration of riparian and channel structure by overgrazing, or indirect, such as when high road density in the uplands impacts water quality and timing of flows. For the Central Bear River subbasin, biologists spatially displayed possible threats to cutthroat populations by mapping road densities (step 3(B)), and water quality integrity (step 3(C)). Aquatic specialists then evaluated the threats and identified those that Forest Service management or cooperative partnership actions could influence.

In the national forest plan revision process, risks and threats to native fish species on the subwatershed level would be included in the CER.


Click to view citations... Literature Cited

Encyclopedia ID: p3537



Home » Environmental Threats » Case Studies » Case Study: An Aquatic Multi-Scale Assessment and Planning Framework Approach » The Six-Step Framework Template » Step 3 - Risks and Threats


 
Skip to content. Skip to navigation
Text Size: Large | Normal | Small