10TH CONFERENCE OF WORLD ECONOMISTS ON GLOBALIZATION
AND PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT
A
space for diversity of opinions
• From March 3 through 7, more
than 1,000 experts from 55 countries debated the
significant problems concerning the planet, with the
general consensus that a better world is possible •
Fidel, honorary member of LACEA
BY HAYDEE LEON
MOYA —Granma International
staff writer—
REAFFIRMING itself as the stage for profound
analysis of the greatest problems on a planetary
scale, the 10th Conference of World Economists on
Globalization and Problems of Development that took
place recently in Havana, was also consolidated as a
forum in which there is increasingly greater space
for differences of opinions.
More than 1,300 economists and specialists from
other social disciplines from 55 countries and 24
international organizations extended the convention
on this occasion, in the context of which the
General Assembly of the Latin American and Caribbean
Economic Association declared Fidel Castro an
honorary member of this organization in recognition
of his personal contribution to this meeting of
challenges and learning. Among the most outstanding
individuals present was Canadian Robert Mundell,
Nobel Prize winner in 1999, who opened up the debate
during the inaugural session after his lecture on "Management
of the Global Economy." Unlike the fairly
generalized opinion of many of the experts from
various countries on the crisis facing the U.S.
economy, his vision of the issue is very optimistic.
Considered one of the most influential economists
of contemporary times, a collaborator of U.S.
President Ronald Reagan, advisor to the European
Economic Community and one of the founding fathers
of the euro, Mundell acknowledged the crisis of the
monetary system imposed at Bretton Woods in 1945,
which gave supremacy to the dollar as a worldwide
currency. Today, confidence in greenbacks has been
lost but, he affirmed, there will be a recovery of
the economy from the third trimester, after six
months of stagnation.
He said that the crisis in the United States
should not be over-dramatized, nor should the fall
in value of the dollar, given that the system can
assimilate it. However, he acknowledged that a
global deceleration that lasts too long could lead
to a worldwide economic crisis.
One of his most outstanding proposals was for the
INTOR, a new international currency based on a
basket integrating the dollar, euro, yen and pound
sterling, which would set the bases for a renewed
monetary system on the planet.
He talked of the emergence of China as an
economic power as a result of changes initiated in
1978, which transformed it into a socialist economy
of the market and highlighted how the process was
undertaken from state enterprises, unlike other
countries that, following the neoliberal path,
dismantled the public sector.
U.S. HEADING FOR RECESSION
Meanwhile, Mark Weisbrot, director of the Center
for Economic and Policy Research in Washington,
confirmed that the United States is heading for a
recession after two consecutive trimesters of a
deceleration in the economy. This situation will
lead to reduced employment and raise the number of
people living on the poverty line in this country.
The impact will be particularly serious for Mexico
and Canada, who are highly dependent on exchange
with the United States, he assured.
He recalled that in the last 10 years, people in
certain regions of Latin America have voted for
change at election times, given the disappearance of
economic growth, something that has been
particularly marked since the 1980s. The specialist
gave the example of Venezuela: "That nation has had
sustained economic growth, has taken control of its
oil, set aside money for healthcare and education
for the people, offered credits to other poor
countries, lifted millions of people out of poverty
and stabilized inflation. This separation from
neoliberalism will continue to be emphasized in the
coming years and other countries will increasingly
understand that this dependency on the United States
is no good for them, which will lead to political
change, something that has not occurred in the
region for 150 years," he affirmed.
Academics such as Mexican Oscar Ugarteche,
Chilean Orlando Caputo and Belgian Eric Toussaint,
president of the Committee to Cancel the Third World
Debt, were all in agreement when suggesting that the
essential factor is that this is not just an
economic matter, but one of justice: "given that we
are burdening the rest of the world with a problem
that is not ours; for that reason we must change the
global order in order to produce a more just one."
Caputo placed the issue within the context of the
structural crisis that capitalism is currently
suffering, noting that there have been six cyclical
crisis in the last 30 years. The one that is looming
could be the worst yet with the most catastrophic
consequences, given the phenomenon of globalization
and the control exercised by transnationals
producing goods and services, in the main from the
United States.
The U.S. crisis over high-risk (subprime)
mortgages is a serious problem and should not be
taken lightly, warned Caputo, confirming that
although the system will modify or absorb it, the
distortions are so profound that, in the end, the
solution will need to be a revolutionary one.
Another individual who stood out during this
meeting on globalization was U.S. academic Eric S.
Maskin, winner of the 2007 Nobel Prize for Economic
Science, who gave a lecture enitled: "Why haven’t
global markets reduced inequity?," in which he
maintained that globalization has caused tremendous
social inequality in many countries in Latin America
and the world.
He gave examples of how this phenomenon
originates from the internationalization of
production itself, given that the wage of a worker
in the United States is greater than that of a
Mexican worker even when the two of them take part
in manufacturing the same product, which their
countries will import in the end. The U.S. expert
explained that raising educational levels could help
the poor to become part of this kind of joint
production.
BIOFUELS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION
Participants in the event devoted several days to
an analysis of the consequences of the use of
biofuels at the expense of foodstuffs and the
environment.
Emilio Romero, from the Autonomous University of
Mexico, tackled the issue, stating that the United
States has provoked an increase in the price of
basic grains, particularly corn, by promoting this
energy matrix in order to satisfy the desires of its
own automobile industry. He referred to the serious
situation that this will create for poor countries
in the so-called Third World, who depend on these
basic crops to feed their peoples.
He gave the example of Mexico which fell "into
the trap of neglecting its alimentary self-sufficiency
and is now obliged to purchase 10 million tons of
corn in order to respond to internal demand. The
oversight in terms of producing these foodstuffs is
intensifying poverty, increasing migration,
malnutrition, drug trafficking and generating
dangerous situations for the social and political
stability of his country.
THE WORLD BANK: A NEVER-ENDING COUP D’ÉTAT
This is the title of the book by Belgian Eric
Toussaint that was launched at the economists’
forum, in which he acknowledges that proposals by
the World Bank were designed to impose the economic
and financial leadership of the United States on a
planetary scale. Published by El Viejo Topo from
Barcelona in 2006, the book brings together a
comprehensive study of how the World Bank
contributes more to strengthening developed
countries’ control over developing ones.
According to the author, for almost 20 years
international financial institutions and the
governments of creditor nations "have played an
ambiguous and destructive game consisting of
commanding the economies of the Third World and
imposing unpopular economic policies on certain
countries, hoping that the bitter pill of macro-economic
adjustment will allow them to find the road to
prosperity and the absence of debts.
The World Bank, together with the IMF, are the
two most important tools of neoliberalism and the
best example of this is that the neoliberal model,
after having been imposed with the help of
dictatorships, has been maintained thanks to the
yoke of debt and permanent structural adjustment.
SPECIAL MOMENT
After five days of debate, and on behalf of all
the participants, Argentine academic Atilio Borón
read a message to Fidel Castro in which he wished
him "a full recovery and congratulations for the
first 10 years of this event, "which was your idea
and that brings us together every year."
In a speech at the end of the conference, Roberto
Berrier invited those present to return to Havana
from March 2 and 6, 2009.
There was also an announcement of the 10th
Congress of Latin American and Caribbean Economists,
scheduled for Bogotá in September of this year and
whose principal objective is the analysis of
development prospects for this region in this
century.
|