CMP -- United Business Media

Intelligent Enterprise

Better Insight for Business Decisions

UBM
Intelligent Enterprise - Better Insight for Business Decisions
Part of the TechWeb Network
Intelligent Enterprise
search Intelligent Enterprise




In Defense of Hype | Intelligent Enterprise Blog
In Context, by Doug Henschen
Doug Henschen joined Intelligent Enterprise as Editor in 2004 and was named Editor-in-Chief in January 2007. He has specialized in covering the intersection of business intelligence, performance management, business process management and rules management technologies within enterprise applications and architectures.
See More by Doug Henschen

In Defense of Hype

Posted by Doug Henschen
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
3:54 PM

As a writer and editor, I felt a twinge of guilt when I read Seth Grimes' blog on hyperbolic PR and "writers and editors who don't have the time, knowledge, and/or judgment to ask the right questions." Seth's last two blogs came about because a SaaS-model BI vendor served up what he felt was self-conscious PR overstating the market significance of the company's actual accomplishments. I guess I've read so many press releases -- and so few that tow the sober, responsible line that Seth puts forth -- that I've developed a permanent BS filter (and after rereading my own blog on said vendor, I don't feel guilty).

Seth went on to lament "yet another company hanging on salesforce.com's coattails," but lets look at Salesforce.com itself. The company had revenues of about $310 million last year. That's peanuts, yet the company seems to get about as much media attention as IBM, Oracle and many other technology titans many times its size.That level of attention will be seen as justified if, years from now, we see a "forest" of SaaS products where there once were but "a few trees," to borrow Seth's analogy. It's notable that Oracle, SAP, Business Objects and Cognos are all responding to and experimenting with the SaaS model.

Google was once a tiny company, too, and its revenues ($10.6 billion in 2006) are still only a fraction of Microsoft's ($44 billion) or Exxon Mobile's ($378 billion), yet its influence (in the media and on Wall Street) is justifiably huge. My point is that sometimes startups and new categories can have an impact that is far out of proportion to the dry facts of how much revenue they generate or the limits of product portfolios today. True, many big dreams just won't pan out. For every Amazon.com there are 10 if not 100 Pets.coms. Or perhaps it's that for every iPod there is a Newton -- maybe we'll only see a few trees, like Salesforce.com, grow into giant sequoias.

Either way, there are often big possibilities in seemingly small developments. Sober PR is a good thing, but I'm willing to cut some little guys a bit of slack for having big dreams.



E-MAIL | SLASHDOT | DIGG




This is a public forum. CMP Technology and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Technology makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Technology's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.


 




    Subscribe to RSS