In Context, by Doug Henschen
Doug Henschen joined Intelligent Enterprise as Editor in 2004 and was named Editor-in-Chief in January 2007. He has specialized in covering the intersection of business intelligence, performance management, business process management and rules management technologies within enterprise applications and architectures. See More by Doug Henschen The Good, Better, Best Among BI/Search Combos
Posted by Doug Henschen Not all combinations of search and BI technology are created equal, but most do have one thing in common -- they're not ready yet. We've been pining for an interview with an end user with first-hand experience with the combination, but Business Objects, Cognos, IBI and others couldn't point us to anyone. I'm told such customers exist, but I'm guessing they're finding it's really hard to use search-style queries to uncover structured information that's on target. Most of the Google/BI integrations announced last year will deliver what IDC search expert Sue Feldman calls "Beginner BI." "What they're doing is using search to pull specific information out of databases into the Google interface," she says. "That requires a certain amount of work for each query" By "work" she means coding, so, for example, you might be able to take your top internal queries and hardwire the search engine to deliver specific data and reports known to provide the right answers. At the next level of sophistication, being pursued by both Business Objects and Cognos (in addition to their level-one efforts), a more ad-hoc approach is supported by searching table metadata, but it's an inherently "data-centric approach," says Feldman. "The major problem is that every time you use a BI tool, you have to prestructure the report that you want to get out of it," she says. "If you later want to do ad hoc questions you didn't anticipate, you're going to have to spend time creating a new cube or report with the desired parameters." Feldman says she's impressed with the approach announced this week by FAST, which enables the search engine to index entire columns, rows and table titles, so it can support true ad hoc search. Endeca is another search vendor pursuing this avenue. Most encouraging, FAST can actually point to customers, such as Reuters and Clif Bar, that say it works. Even if search interfaces manage to bring more users to the BI table, my concern is that imprecise user keyword search practices and long hit lists will only compound the "single-version-of-the-truth" problem. Those with experience with knowledge bases know only too well that customers can get completely overwhelmed by the volume of possible answers to a query, even when the question is presented by the help system and hardwired to all the right answers.
E-MAIL | SLASHDOT | DIGG This is a public forum. CMP Technology and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Technology makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers. Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Technology's Terms of Service. Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.
|
Blog Channels
Cindi Howson on Business Intelligence The Brain Food Blogger Tony Byrne on Content Management SQL Puzzlers by Joe Celko Rajan Chandras on IT & Information Management Seth Grimes on Analytics In Context by Doug Henschen Phil Kemelor on Web Analytics Sandy Kemsley's Column Two Nelson King on Enterprise App Development David Linthicum on Software as a Service Natural Insight, By Mark Madsen Alan Pelz-Sharpe on Content Management Mark Smith on Performance Management Neil Raden on Business Intelligence Bruce Silver on Business Process Management Product Maven Subscribe to RSS Archives
|
|