About the organizations
Several Indigenous groups have been adopting ways of representation
that are typical of our society as a way to find new forms of insertion
into the national political scene. In these organizations the Indians
hold meetings, choose their directors by vote, register their statutes
in notary publics and open their own bank accounts. The appearance and
development of those organizations has promoted the emergence of leaders
and new forms of alliances.
Such organizations have many differences among themselves, be it in
terms of mandate, of how large their focus is or of the kinds of alliances
they make. There are Indigenous organizations that are linked to a single
village; others represent several peoples established along a given
river; there also cases of organizations with aspirations of political
representation in the inter-local and regional plans.
The greater part of the Indigenous organizations are ethnic and locally
based (on a village or a community), such as the Associação
Xavante de Pimentel Barbosa (Pimentel Barbosa Xavante Association),
or inter-local (a group of villages or communities), such as the Aciri
(Associação das Comunidades Indígenas do Rio Içana
Association of the Indigenous Communities of the Içana
River), or the CGTT (Conselho Geral da Tribo Ticuna General Council
of the Ticuna Tribe). There are also a few regional organizations, such
as the UNI-AC (União das Nações Indígenas
do Acre Union of the Indigenous Nations of Acre), the CIR (Conselho
Indígena de Roraima Roraimas Indigenous Council),
the FOIRN (Federação das Organizações Indígenas
do Rio Negro Federation of the Indigenous Organizations of the
Negro River) and, with a wider range, the COIAB (Coordenação
das Organizações Indígenas da Amazônia Brasileira
Coordination of the Brazilian Amazonias Indigenous Organizations).
After the short-lived experience of a national representation of the
UNI (União das Nações Indígenas Union
of the Indigenous Nations), which was never formally institutionalized,
in 1992 was founded, in a COIAB meeting, the Capoib (Conselho de Articulação
dos
Povos e Organizações Indígenas do Brasil
Council for the Joint Action of the Indigenous Peoples and Organizations
of Brazil), under the assistance, and promoted by, the Cimi (Conselho
Indigenista Missionário Missionary Indigenist Council
-, an official organ of the Conselho Nacional dos Bispos do Brasil
National Council of Brazils Bishops -, CNBB, belonging to the
Roman Catholic Church).
In general, Indigenous organizations tend to be volatile, which illustrates
the difficulties Indians face for building stable forms of representation
with such a diversified and spread out base. In Brazil, the demographic,
linguistic and spatial diversity among Indians make the question of
political representation very peculiar when compared, for instance,
to the situation in Bolivia (where 57% of the population is Indigenous),
Peru (40%) or Ecuador (30%). Here, Indigenous politics proper, autonomous
and permanent, is an essentially local reality (of each village, community
or family), factional (in the case, for example, of villages whose social
organization is based on ritual halves to which a chief each is associated
with) and decentralized (with no recognition of a center of power.