back to flak's homepage
spacer
spacer
TV

Archives
Submissions

RECENTLY IN TV

Saving Grace
by James Norton

Pirate Master
by A.D. Lively

The Sopranos Finale
by David Essex and Matt Hanson

Veronica Mars, In Memoriam
by Anthony Letizia

The Last Temptation of Clay
by James Norton

Drive
by Anthony Letizia

The Remote
by Louis Goddard

Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job!
by James Norton

Raines
by James Norton

The Legacy of Joss Whedon
by Anthony Letizia

More TV ›

TV CRITICS WANTED

Flak seeks writers to write reviews, essays and interviews for its TV section. Special emphasis on short, timely takes on current programming, networks and ads.

No pay. Some glory. Lots of editorial back-and-forth, and a nice-looking clip for your files. Check out our guidelines for details or contact TV editor Joey Rubin.



ABOUT FLAK

Help wanted: Winter Intern

About Flak
Archives
Letters to Flak
Submissions
Rec Reading
Rejected!

SEARCH FLAK

flakmag.comwww
Powered by Google
ALSO BY FLAK

Flak Sunday Comics
The Spam Blog
The Remote
Flak Print [6mb PDF]
Flak Daily Photo

MAILING LIST
Sign up for Flak's weekly e-mail updates:

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

spacer

saving graceSaving Grace
TNT
Mondays 10/9 p.m. Central

Saving Grace is a new TNT hour-long drama wherein Holly Hunter plays Grace. Grace is a slutty, violent, alcoholic, atheistic Oklahoma cop with a heart of gold. In order to retain the audience's sympathy, it is revealed in the debut episode that Grace became an atheist because of abuse suffered at the hands of a priest in 4th grade; atheism, of course, is essentially a type of mental disorder.

The first show in the series hinges upon a miraculous event. Not a possible miraculous event; the divine power is CGI-accentuated, and therefore as real as cold Chicago winters and income tax. An incredibly intoxicated Grace runs over a dude by the side of the road. In a moment of atheistic doubt, she implores God for assistance. A chaw-loving, good ol' boy angel named Earl appears, whisks her off to a precarious stone pillar several thousand feet above the Grand Canyon and asks her to accept God. In return: the dead body goes away. Inexplicably, Grace still isn't sure if she wants to join the side of the angels.

Strong winds blow, and Grace must cling to the angel for support. She finally relaxes, now that her life is no longer in peril and the danger has relented. "That's the power of faith," he says.

To clarify: an angel — a literal, wing-having angel — offers to help you get out of murdering someone if you accept God and clean up your life. You hesitate, so he threatens to kill you. You finally decide to accept the gift, because a) God is obviously, literally real, and b) you don't want to get blown into the Grand Canyon. Oh, and c) if you kill someone while driving drunk, it has legal reprecussions.

In what way does this decision relate to faith? It is said that proof denies faith, but there's a lot of gray area to play with there. Many apparent miracles can be written off as natural quirks, probabalistic anomalies that are undeniably weird, but explicable through science. Or, if you want to take a leap, faith.

Being teleported by a homicidal angel to the top of the Grand Canyon does not squeeze even into the very edge of this gaping chasm of a philosophical gray area. Once this happens, not believing in God isn't a matter of being an atheist, it's a matter of being a fucking idiot.

Put into the same circumstances as Grace, Christopher Hitchens would accept God.

It's not clear that this kind of theologically boneheaded setup is necessarily a bad thing.

The remarkable thing about the program is that it manages to work on two levels: first, as a sort of sexy, violent, hard-chargin' Sopranos for the Bible-thumping fundamentalist Christian literalist set. Second, as a deconstruction of everything the abortion-fighting, death penalty-loving pro-war Bible belt masses buy into. If you happen to believe that Heaven and Hell are literal, and that God acts directly upon the world through spiritual agents, Saving Grace is pleasantly validating and engaging. And if you happen to believe the opposite, the show is stimulatingly annoying and/or a parody of everything you've rejected as being a bunch of superstitious hokum.

If you're the kind of person who wants to watch a chaw-spitting angel named Earl attempt to save sexy, drunky, crazy Grace from her sinful ways, there's lots of back-and-forth to savor. If you're the kind of person who finds this kind of spiritual hokum to be a bunch of crap, you'll still feel vigorously exercised by the show's hard-charging and unapologetically direct approach to delicate theological questions. The acting is strong, the music is good, and the show's not likely to leave many viewers lacking an opinion.

The debut does raise a procedural question: After leading off with an angel performing a miracle, where do you go from there?

James Norton (jim@flakmag.com)

ALSO BY …

Also by James Norton:
The Weekly Shredder

The Wire vs. The Sopranos
Interview: Seth MacFarlane
Aqua Teen Hunger Force: The Interview
Homestar Runner Breaks from the Pack
Rural Stories, Urban Listeners
The Sherman Dodge Sign
The Legal Helpers Sign
Botan Rice Candy
Cinnabons
Diablo II
Shaving With Lather
Killin' Your Own Kind
McGriddle
This Review
The Parkman Plaza Statues
Mocking a Guy With a Hitler Mustache
Dungeons and Dragons
The Wash
More by James Norton ›

 
spacer
spacer

All materials copyright © 1999-2007 by Flak Magazine

spacer