Wikipedia:Hakcipta

Dari Wikipedia, ensiklopedia bebas

Wikipedia:Hakcipta

Daripada Wikipedia, ensaiklopedia percuma.

Matlamat Wikipedia ialah mencipta sumber maklumat dalam bentuk ensaiklopedia secara percuma. Lesen yang kami guna memberikan capaian percuma kepada kandungan kami seperti aturcara (software) percuma dilesenkan. Oleh itu kandungan Wikipedia boleh disalin, sunting, dan disebarkan selagi versi baru memberikan kebebasan yang sama kepada orang lain dan mengakui Wikipedia sebagai sumber. Olehitu, rencana Wikipedia kekal percuma selamanya dan boleh digunakan oleh sesiapapun tertakluk kepada beberapa syarat, yang bertujuan mengekalkan kebebasan tersebut.

Untuk memenuhi matlamat tersebut, teks terkandung dalam Wikipedia dilesenkan kepada umum di bawah Lesen Dokumen Percuma GNU "GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)". Teks penuh berkenaan lesen ini terdapat di Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Kebenaran diberikan untuk menyalin, mengedar dan/atau menyunting teks semua bahan Wikipedia di bawah Lesen Dokumen Percuma GNU, Versi 1.2 atau sebarang Versi dikeluarkan oleh Tabung Aturcara Percuma "Free Software Foundation"; dengan tiada Bahagian Invariant "Invariant Sections", tanpa Teks Halaman Hadapan "Front-Cover Texts", dan tanpa Teks Halaman Belakang "Back-Cover Texts".

Teks GFDL merupakan satu-satunya dokumen sah "legally binding document"; apa yang berikut merupakan pemahaman kami tentang GFDL: hak dan tanggungjawab pengguna dan penyumbang.

PENTING: Jika anda ingin menggunakan kandungan Wikipedia, baca terlebih dahulu seksyen hak dan tanggungjawab Pengguna. Anda kemudian perlu membaca Lesen Dokumen Percuma GNU "GNU Free Documentation License".

Kandungan

 1   Hak dan tanggungjawab Pengguna
 1.1 Contoh pemberitahuan
 1.2 Bahan Fair use dan keperluan khusus.
 2 Garis panduan Gambar (Image)
 2.1 Karya asli oleh pengarang Wikipedia
 2.2 Gambar hasil kerja seni lama
 2.3 Gambar terkemuka
 2.4 Gambar kerajaan
 2.5 Gambar bintang
 3 Hak penyumbang dan tanggungjawab
 3.1 Menggunakan hasil hakcipta orang lain
 3.2 Sambungan kepada hasil hakcipta
 3.3 Jika anda menjumpai pencerobohan hakcipta
 4 Lihat juga


Hak dan tanggung jawab pengguna

Jika anda ingin menggunakan bahan Wikipedia di dalam buku/rencana/laman web atau sebarang terbitan, anda boleh melakukannya, tetapi anda perlu mematuhi GFDL, seperti berikut:

bahan anda perlu di lesenkan di bawah GFDL, anda perlu mengakui hak penulisan rencana (seksyen 4B), dan anda mesti membenarkan laluan kepada bahan "salinan transparent copy" (seksyen 4J). ("transparent copy" of a Wikipedia article is its wiki text.)

If you are simply duplicating the Wikipedia article, the latter two obligations can be fulfilled by providing a conspicuous direct link back to the Wikipedia article hosted on this website.

If you create a derivative version by changing or adding content, you need to both acknowledge authorship and provide access to a transparent copy of the new text.

 Example notice 

An example notice, which complies correctly with the GFDL, for an article that uses the Wikipedia article Foo might read as follows:

This article is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>. It uses material from the <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo">Wikipedia article "Foo"</a>.

("Foo" and the Wikipedia URL must of course be substituted accordingly.)

Alternatively you can distribute your copy of Foo along with a copy of the GFDL (as explained in the text) and list at least five (or all if less than five) principal authors on the title page (or top of the document).

Fair use materials and special requirements

Occasionally, Wikipedia articles may include images, sounds, or text quotes used under the "fair use" doctrine. In this case, the material should be identified as from an external source (on the image description page, or history page, as appropriate). However, what is fair for us to use may not be fair for your intended use of the media.

For example, if we include an image under fair use, you must ensure that your use of the article also qualifies for fair use (this might not be the case, for example, if you were using a Wikipedia article for a commercial use that would otherwise be allowed by the GFDL).

Wikipedia does use some text under licenses that are compatible with the GFDL but may require additional terms that we do not require for original Wikipedia text (such as including Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, or Back-Cover Texts). When using these materials, you have to include those invariant sections verbatim.

 Image guidelines 

Images and photographs, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone owns them unless they have been explictly placed in the public domain. Images on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf. In some cases, fair use guidelines may allow a photograph to be used.

 Original work by Wikipedia editor 
 Awesome. You rock! 
 Photographs of old works of art 
 Add guidelines here. 
 examples: Mona Lisa, Michelangelo's David 
 Famous photographs 
 Add guidelines here. 
 examples: the Hindenburg disaster, Charles Lindbergh, etc. 
 Government photographs 
 Not all photographs on .gov and .mil sites are public domain. Please be careful to check ownership information before copying. 
 Celebrity photographs 

This is based on the image guidelines at IMDB, so it especially applies to celebrity photographs, but also can apply to other pictures. Legitimate photographs generally come from three different places with permission.

1.The studios, producers, magazine publisher, or media outlet that originally shot the photograph.

 2.Agencies that represent the photographers who shot the photos or the photographer themself (the latter especially for amateur photographs) 
 3.Submissions from the celebrity themselves or a legal representatives of the celebrity. 
 Contributors' rights and obligations 
 If you contribute material to Wikipedia, you thereby license it to the public under the GFDL (with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). In order to contribute, you therefore must be in a position to grant this license, which means that either  you own the copyright to the material, for instance because you produced it yourself, or  you acquired the material from a source that allows the licensing under GFDL, for instance because the material is in the public domain or is itself published under GFDL. 
 In the first case, you retain copyright to your materials. You can later republish and relicense them in any way you like. However, you can never retract the GFDL license for the versions you placed here: that material will remain under GFDL forever. In the second case, if you incorporate external GFDL materials, as a requirement of the GFDL, you need to acknowledge the authorship and provide a link back to the network location of the original copy. If the original copy required invariant sections, you have to incorporate those into the Wikipedia article; it is however very desirable to replace GFDL texts with invariant sections by original content without invariant sections whenever possible. 
 Using copyrighted work from others 

If you use part of a copyrighted work under "fair use", or if you obtain special permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright holder under the terms of our license, you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates). It is our goal to be able to freely redistribute as much of Wikipedia's material as possible, so original images and sound files licensed under the GFDL or in the public domain are greatly preferred to copyrighted media files used under fair use. See Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission for a form letter asking a copyright holder to grant us a license to use their work under terms of the GFDL.

 Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt the project. If in doubt, write it yourself. 
 Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is perfectly legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate it in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia. (See plagiarism and fair use for discussions of how much reformulation is necessary in a general context.) 
 Linking to copyrighted works 
 Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Whether such a link is contributory infringement is currently being debated in the courts, but in any case, linking to a site that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on us. 
 If you find a copyright infringement 
 It is not the job of rank-and-file Wikipedians to police every article for possible copyright infringement, but if you suspect one, you should at the very least bring up the issue on that page's talk page. Others can then examine the situation and take action if needed. The most helpful piece of information you can provide is a URL or other reference to what you believe may be the source of the text. 
 Some cases will be false alarms. For example, if the contributor was in fact the author of the text that is published elsewhere under different terms, that does not affect their right to post it here under the GFDL. Also, sometimes you will find text elsewhere on the Web that was copied from Wikipedia. In both of these cases, it is a good idea to make a note in the talk page to discourage such false alarms in the future. 
 If some of the content of a page really is an infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the talk page, along with the original source. If the author's permission is obtained later, the text can be restored. 
 If all of the content of a page is a suspected copyright infringement, then the page should be listed it on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/copyvio and the content of the article replaced by the standard notice which you can find there. If, after a week, the page still appears to be a copyright infringment, then it may be deleted following the procedures on the votes page. 
 In extreme cases of contributors continuing to post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings, such users may be blocked from editing to protect the project. 
 See also 
 The Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for questions on copyright. 
 Wikipedia's designated agent under OCILLA 
 Wikipedia:Sites that use Wikipedia as a source 
 Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter 
 Wikipedia:Spotting possible copyright violations 
 Further discussion... 
 Wikipedia:Copyright issues 
 m:Wikipedia and copyright issues 
 m:Avoid Copyright Paranoia 
  m:Permission grant extent
Personal tools