SF Gate.com Home


SFGate Home
Today's Chronicle

Sports
Entertainment

News & Features
Business
Opinion
Politics
Technology
Crime
Science
Weird News
Polls
Photo Gallery
Columnists
Travel
Lottery
Obituaries

Personal Shopper

Classifieds
Jobs
Personals
Real Estate
Rentals
Vehicles
WebAds

Regional
Traffic
Weather
Live Views
Maps
Bay Area Traveler
Wine Country
Reno & Tahoe
Ski & Snow
Outdoors
Earthquakes
Schools

Entertainment
Food & Dining
Wine
Movies
Music & Nightlife
Events
Performance
Art
Books
Comics
TV & Radio
Search Listings

Living
Health
Home & Garden
Gay & Lesbian
Horoscope

Resources
Search & Archives
Feedback/Contacts
Corrections
Newsletters
Promotions
Site Index

Subscriber Service
Missed Delivery
Vacation Hold
Subscribe
Contact

Advertising
Advertise Online
Place Print Ad
Media Kit
 



Brain-damaged boy wins huge verdict
Stanford Hospital, Palo Alto clinic failed to diagnose illness, jury says

Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 30, 2003

A San Francisco jury has awarded $70.9 million to the family of a brain-damaged boy whose family accused Stanford Hospital and the Palo Alto Medical Clinic of malpractice for failing to diagnose his genetic disease.

The Superior Court jury returned a verdict Friday in favor of 9-year-old Michael Cook of Redwood City and his parents following a five-week trial. Jurors assigned 35 percent of the fault to the hospital, where the child was born, and 65 percent to the clinic, where he received pediatric care until he was 2.

Michael was born with the metabolic disorder PKU, or phenylketonuria, which allows the buildup of an amino acid that is toxic to the central nervous system. According to medical experts, the disorder occurs once every 10,000 to 15,000 births and can be detected by a test that is required by law for all newborns. If it is diagnosed early, it can usually be controlled by a restrictive, lifelong low-protein diet. If untreated, it can cause severe and permanent retardation.

According to the lawsuit, the hospital conducted its PKU test too early -- four hours after Michael's birth -- to detect the condition, and the clinic pediatrician never tested the boy despite seeing signs of major developmental problems. Michael's disease wasn't diagnosed until he was nearly 6, too late for treatment. By then, his mother was pregnant with another son, whose PKU was diagnosed soon after birth and who is functioning normally, his parents said.

Michael will never be able to work or live on his own, is fed through a tube and can speak only a few words, said the Cooks' lawyer, David Baum.

"He's a very sweet boy. He wants to make people happy," his mother, Cara Cook, 39, said Monday. "He's also very lonely. He doesn't have any friends. He doesn't know how to communicate with people. . . . He doesn't know how to play.

Also, his attention span is very short."

Just the other day, she said, Michael said his first four-word sentence, while being fed: "I want some more."

For years, doctors "kept telling us that everything was going to get better but that it will take time," Cook said. "My life was running from therapy to therapy."

Cook, a former flight attendant, said the verdict would allow her and her husband, David, 43, a laid-off financial officer, to get individualized therapy for their son and send him to a private school rather than the special- education classes he now attends in public school. Baum said $56 million of the verdict was to cover the costs of care, and $14 million was for lost future wages. The remainder was for suffering caused by brain damage.

David Sheuerman, lawyer for Stanford Hospital, said the hospital followed standard practice in Bay Area hospitals at the time in conducting its PKU screening. Not until the following year, 1995, did state health officials issue guidelines saying the screening should be no sooner than 12 hours after birth, he said. Whether the hospital should have waited 12 hours was a subject of dispute among expert witnesses at the trial.

Jurors voted 10-2 to find the hospital negligent and 11-1 to find the clinic negligent. A three-fourths vote of at least 9-3 is required for a verdict in civil cases.

Evidently, "the jury felt that something needed to be done to take care of this child for the rest of his life (and) wanted to find somebody responsible, " Sheuerman said. He said the hospital was unlikely to appeal the verdict.

A lawyer for the medical clinic was unavailable for comment.

E-mail Bob Egelko at begelko@sfchronicle.com.

· Printer-friendly version
· Email this article to a friend


Health
.Main Health Page
.Current Doctor E's Diary

Bay Recruiter Top Jobs
PHARMACEUTICAL
Pharmaceutical Industry Openings

ACCOUNTING
CONTROLLER A subsidiary of a large p

ASSEMBLER
SEEKING Mechanical Assemblers for gr

ACCOUNTING
SENIOR TAX MANAGER Continued growth

TECHNICIANS
On Location Repair Service

ACCOUNTING
FUND ACCOUNTANT Top tier, mid-Penin

NURSING FACULTY
International consulting
Sylvia Rayfield &

QUALITY
ASSURANCE Benefit Cosmetics-QA Mgr w

SALES
American Home Craft Inc. A "Sales Dr

SPEECH
THERAPIST COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY Needs F

SALES
100 Best Companies

SALES
Cinder Block National Sales Manager

SUPERINTENDENT
for lrg comm'l landscape firm. Salar

FINANCE
MULTIPLE POSITIONS

JEWELER
JOURNEYMAN DAVID CLAY JEWELERS Desig

RETAIL
OPEN HOUSE

PLANNER
ASSOC. or ASST. ENVIRON'L PLANNER

DENTIST
for partnership. Long term. Prefer r

RETAIL
MANAGEMENT

RESTAURANT
WOLFGANG PUCK'S POSTRIO P.M. Line Co

SOCIAL
SERVICES House Manager: 40 hrs/wk M-

FINANCE
Put your contacts to work for you.

PHYSICIANS
San Francisco Office
Boston Medical Grp

PET
CARE Mgr for new nat'l pet care biz

CONSTRUCTION
MULTIPLE POSITIONS

About Top Jobs
View All Top Jobs



Page A - 15
Buy The San Francisco Chronicle Get 50% off home delivery of the Chronicle for 12 weeks!
©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback