|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are you one of the unfortunate folks whose Word 97/2000 documents are misbehaving? Do you find yourself muttering, "Why is Word ACTING like this?" While our phone calls and emails cover virtually every aspect of document misbehavior, certain themes have emerged. Whether your documents were converted from some other application, or have been tortured in native Word, you're probably having trouble with one or all of the following:
The cry we hear is, "I need to clean up this document so I can work on it/compare it/send it to the client. Where can I look to discover the problem? How can I fix what's wrong?" Thankfully, there are several easy, consistent ways that Word users can track down and repair document problems. |
|||
|
The first hurdle is to come to grips with the realization that there's almost always more than one problem in a problem document, and that your job is to find (and fix!) them all. Breaking the task into categories helps. A good method is to work within the framework of Word's "object model." Word is a collection of different objects working together to create the document's structure. In general, the problems involve one or more of the following topics:
You need to master a different mindset to troubleshoot Word documents. This is because almost every other word processor was based on in-line formatting codes, which the printer (and to a lesser extent, the screen display) would read sequentially, from left to right, top to bottom. WordPerfect made these codes visible through the mechanism of Reveal Codes, and the user (and the printer and the screen) could see the instructions interspersed throughout the text (e.g., [Bold On]Conclusion[Bold Off]). Word manages formatting and layout through something called the Object Model, whereby commands that determine how text appears and behaves are embedded within the appropriate Word object (in Word, they are said to be the object's properties). This way, if a paragraph has double-spacing associated with it, then Word looks first to the paragraph marker at the end of a given paragraph, and reads all of the properties associated with that paragraph marker (of which double-spacing is just one). There are no "codes" to be revealed, because the instructions don't exist in a sequential order in a particular location on the page. Instead, they are embedded within the appropriate object. Below is a discussion of a number of Word objects, along with potential problems that may arise in connection with them. At the end of this document is a table which briefly lists each object, along with potential problems and troubleshooting techniques. |
||
The Document Object
|
The most important object in Word is the document itself-the file "container." Items attached to the document object that are vital to the clean-up task are:
|
||
Problems That Might Exist With the Document Object |
|
||
The Section Object |
The next level
in the Word object model is the Section. In previous word processing
applications, you could change page layout instructions by inserting
codes (e.g., top/bottom margins, page orientation, different
page numbering, etc.) at the point where you wanted the change to occur.
Word wants you to consider these changes through the concept of "sections"
(i.e., this section of my document uses small Roman numerals in its
page numbers, this section has landscape pages). This concept is key
for understanding how Word collects formatting information and
embeds it within the appropriate object (in this case, the Section).
To make matters slightly more complicated, there are three distinct types of sections: Next page, Continuous, and Odd/Even-all of which get inserted through section breaks. Legal documents in Word tend to focus on two of them: Next Page and Continuous. Next Page section breaks are inserted where the format change you're introducing logically starts on a new page. These are commonly used to introduce page layout and header/footer commands such as page margins, orientation, or new headers and footers. Continuous section breaks are used when you want to introduce section-related formatting in the middle of an existing page (most commonly, newspaper-style columns or line numbering). In general, legal documents contain only Next Page breaks, and if they contain Continuous breaks they are clearly enabling some kind of page layout formatting that needs to begin in the middle of the page. Often, however, Continuous breaks work their way into a Word document by means of a poor conversion from some other application (Word, in converting the document, is trying to perform some kind of page formatting that would be handled entirely differently if the document were created originally in Word). There are several ways to check whether sections are a problems in the document. Generally speaking, short documents tend not to have many sections. Move to the end of the document and make a quick check of the status bar-if a 6 page document contains 8 sections, you can be pretty sure most of them are unneeded and should be checked. Use the Browse Object to move to each section break, and examine that position in the document to determine whether the break is performing a useful task. If not, delete it. (Be aware, however, that when you delete a section break, Word applies all of the Section properties of the latter section - i.e., the one after the break you're deleting - and applies it to the previous section ...just the opposite of what you might expect it to do.)
|
||
Problems That Might Exist in a Section |
|
||
A Few Words About Headers and Footers |
Headers and footers
are properties of sections-every section has either one, or two, and
you cannot change that. What you can change is whether they have content
or not. There are a few rules to follow when working with headers and
footers:
|
||
The Paragraph Object
|
Next in the Word object model hit parade is the Paragraph object. Much of your clean up time is spent dealing with the paragraph, since it is the primary place where text formatting occurs. It is in the paragraph where you turn over the rocks to see what's lurking underneath. Since the Paragraph object contains such a huge amount of important information, it's recommended that this information (the paragraph's formatting) be collected and applied by using a style. People who use Word (but don't understand it) cause much of the damage here. | ||
Problems You Might Encounter in the Paragraph Object |
No style applied where one would logically belong. An appropriate style applied, but with contrary direct formatting applied on top. A style applied with unwanted attributes (e.g., "no proofing," "condensed font"). Numbering of some kind applied directly (i.e., through Format > Bullets & Numbering) instead of applied through a style. If a paragraph's style is the problem, then modifying the style or creating and applying a different one will generally take care of the problem. Check the style's description and note whether the style is based on Normal, whether the style is appropriate for the paragraph it's applied to (we've seen heading styles applied to obvious body text paragraphs), and whether there is direct formatting applied on top of the style. Check the style area next to a typical body text paragraph. Is the style name "Normal?" If it is, you know that any paragraph formatting the text contains was directly applied (someone selected the text and formatted it, rather than applying a style). Usually, you'll apply formatting directly to text only when you want that piece of text to be different from (contrary to) the typical paragraph style. Think of direct formatting they way you would hot sauce on your dinner-a little goes a long way. Formatting an entire document directly is hard on it. Say you select all the text in a document and apply full justification, and make it all double-spaced. Because you've done it directly, it's as if you've turned justification and double-spacing on and off for every paragraph in the document. Now imagine selecting the entire document and changing the size to 11 points-you've turned a font size code on and off for every character! It's easy to see how indiscriminate direct formatting adds enormous size and complexity to a document. Consistent formatting such as this should be done with styles. Every Word document can contain approximately 30,000 styles! Using styles to format text is a good thing-remember, not only do styles provide consistent formatting, even more important, they give the paragraph purpose, and the document, structure. Word provides you with a very simple method for determining which properties, or attributes, are embedded in any given paragraph. Just choose Help> What's This?, or press Shift+F1. The pointer changes to a pointer with a question mark. Click anywhere in any paragraph, and a message box spells out any style and direct formatting which is applied to the paragraph. Your goal is to create a document in which most of the paragraphs contain an appropriate paragraph style, with little or no directly applied formatting on top. It is important to notice that Word divides the information shown in the What's This? message box into two broad categories (Paragraph and Font) and two sub-categories (direct formatting and style formatting). This is exactly the way Word processes the information as well. Be aware that some direct formatting will not disappear with the application of a style-instead you'll need to remove it manually (or with Find and Replace). Initial tabs and extra paragraph marks between paragraphs are two critical examples.
|
||
The Character Object
|
In Word's object hierarchy, the Character object is fairly low on the list. In general, Word will first look to the Document, then the Section, then individual Paragraphs (and their associated Styles), and then individual characters. There are times when direct character formatting is desirable (e.g., you want to bold or underline particular words), but in general your characters should take on the formatting defined in their applied paragraph style (e.g., Body Text, Normal, etc.). |
||
Problems You Might Encounter in the Character Object |
Watch for printer fonts, either in style definitions or directly applied to text. These have names like Tms Rmn, CG Times, and Courier. They should be replaced with their True Type counterparts, Times New Roman and Courier New. If you're having problems with fonts, check what the style definition is, and what style it is based on. A document's font should be defined in the "Normal" style, and all styles should be based on Normal. This way, every paragraph will have the same font. Documents created in WordPerfect and brought into Word using its native conversion often still contain "WP Typographic Symbols." These can be dangerous because they are difficult to see-until you change the document's font. Then, you'll often find those symbols have changed into empty squares: § becomes ?. To solve this problem, check your document closely. Select any symbols (and this includes quote marks) that look a bit "strange." If the Font Box on the toolbar displays "WP Typographic Symbol," you must to replace the symbol with the correct Word equivalent (under Insert > Symbol). |
||
Footnotes
|
Much evil can occur in a footnote. The problem we encounter most often? "Why is the footnote reference on page 2, and the footnote itself on page 3?" This occurs most often when formatting related to vertical spacing has been applied directly (by selecting text and applying formats). When working with footnotes, styles are a must. Check for the following:
|
||
Problems You Might Encounter in the Footnote Object |
|
||
Tables
|
Tables are one of Word 97/2000's most powerful features, and using tables to give structure to text can make formatting easier and sorting information more efficient. They are generally preferable to using tabs to separate text columns, as they allow phrases to wrap and give you the ability to set different alignments easily. In poorly-created Word documents, however, the presence of tables can make your clean-up headaches worse. |
||
Problems You Might Encounter in the Table Object |
|
||
Field Codes
|
Field Codes provide a way to insert dynamic text into a document-text which updates as changes are made to the document. Examples of dynamic document elements are: table of contents, page numbers, cross-references, or updateable date and time stamps. For each of these different document requirements, Word provides a unique field code. In a converted document, Word attempts to create a field code to represent text which was created dynamically in some other application (for example, paragraph numbering). The clean-up process involves determining whether a field code is performing a useful task in a document (or is legacy code from the old application), or whether it should be deleted or unlinked, then re-created. To delete a field code, select it, then press Delete. To unlink a field code, select it, then press Ctrl+Shift+F9. While most field codes are extraordinarily useful, there are some field codes which should always either be removed or unlinked in order to clean up a document. |
||
Problems You Might Encounter with Field Codes |
|
||
Tables of Contents |
If the Table of Contents in your document was created in Word (rather than converted from WordPerfect), then the clean up task can be a bit more complicated. |
||
Problems You May Encounter in a Table of Contents |
In Word 6/95
and Word 97/2000, it is impossible to mark a run-in type of sentence
for a table of contents; Word only allows you to mark an entire paragraph.
Users who only wanted to include the first sentence in their TOC's "fooled"
Word by placing a paragraph mark after the desired sentence, then hiding
the paragraph mark so that it did not display. When the TOC was generated,
Word obligingly included only the desired sentence.
Firms also used this hidden paragraph mark to enable the first sentence to have a different style (perhaps bold, underlined and numbered) from the "body text" style of the remainder of the paragraph. Firms which have chosen third-party paragraph numbering programs must eliminate these "work-arounds" so that their software can create the desired Table of Contents and/or text styling. There are two steps involved here: first, displaying the hidden text, and second, removing it. To display hidden text, be sure the Show/Hide ¶ button on the standard toolbar is selected, then use the Find feature to search for the "hidden" font attribute. Each time a hidden paragraph mark is found, you'll have to delete that paragraph mark, then continue the search. (Be careful! The text of the paragraph below will now be part of the one above [acquiring its style], potentially removing numbering or adding unwanted formatting. In other words, deleting that hidden paragraph mark could profoundly change the text below-be sure this is what you want to do!) Once all the hidden paragraph marks have been found and removed, check the document for {TC} and {TOC} codes, and unlink or remove them. See the Field Codes section, above, for details. |
||
Automatic Paragraph Numbering
|
We've saved the best (!) for last. The issues involving paragraph numbering encompass the document object, paragraph object, fields, tables of contents, character formatting, and styles. Paragraph numbering may very well be the one item in a Word document which produces the greatest number of help calls. Why? In the words of one of our colleagues, "It's neither simple, nor is it simplistic." It's complicated, it's not particularly intuitive, and if you don't do it perfectly, it breaks. There are a few rules to follow when you are creating, or cleaning up, paragraph numbering: Paragraph numbering should always be linked to styles. Numbered paragraphs should be indented from the margin by modifying the numbered style, never directly. |
||
Problems You May Encounter with Outline Numbering |
If you don't follow
these rules, your document will have two major problems: 1) numbering
will behave badly (paragraph numbers may suddenly all become "6's,"
or they might cease to be sequential-2.0.5 might follow 1.0.9), and
2) indents will not "stick," (paragraphs may jump back to
the left margin unexpectedly and with no warning). Once paragraph numbering
becomes "broken," your options are somewhat limited. If you're
very, very good, and experienced using native Word paragraph numbering,
it is possible to fix a broken numbering style. At Microsystems, we
call the process "digging to China."
In other words, you position the insertion point in a paragraph which has the numbered style you want to modify. Then, it's Format > Style > Modify > Format > Numbering > Customize. In this dialog box you can change the number style (1, 2, 3 or a, b, c), any text associated with the number (like parentheses) its font attributes (bold, etc.). Also set the paragraph's indents (the number's position relative to the margin, and the position of the text, both from the number and from the margin). Finally, it is in this dialog box where you can make sure the level is linked to a style. You'll perform the above steps for every level in the numbering scheme. (For more detailed information about Outline Numbering, see "The Seven Laws of Outline Numbering".) If you're not a numbering virtuoso, it may be simpler to start from scratch, revert briefly to the "normal" style (remove the numbered styles from the affected paragraphs), re-create or modify the desired numbering scheme, then reapply the styles to the paragraphs. To revert to the Normal style on any paragraph, click in the paragraph, then press Ctrl+Shift+N. (Reverting to Normal removes any paragraph formatting which isn't defined in Normal.) If you want to re-create the numbering styles, you can use the Organizer to delete the "bad" ones (unless they're Heading 1 through 9, which are built-in Word styles and can't be deleted). Or what about this: sometimes users will apply a numbered style to a directly-numbered paragraph. The net effect is the very disconcerting disappearance of the numbers! In this case, you'll use Ctrl+Q (which removes directly applied paragraph formatting) before you apply the numbered style. (This is, of course, counter-intuitive, and helps illustrate how numbering problems begin, and how they propagate...). If your firm uses third-party software to create and apply automatic paragraph numbering, you should follow whatever procedure is recommended by that application to re-create or modify its numbered styles |
||
Word Object |
What Can Go Wrong |
What You Can Do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Occasionally, we have seen documents that had a different kind of footnote problem. Specifically, a footnote reference has been deleted, but the footnote itself refuses to disappear. The only solution for this kind of problem – indicating possible corruption of the document itself – is to copy the entire document except for the last paragraph marker and paste it into a new document.) |
|
|
|
|
(See Microsystems’ The Seven Laws of Word’s Outline Numbering for a complete discussion of outline numbering issues |
|
Dedicated to those who have painfully ferreted out these techniques, and to all those who must troubleshoot, defend, minister, uphold, or recover from the damage we do to our documents. With significant insights from Tim Byrne, Teresa Morris, Rex Balboa, Irene Cartwright, and Sherry Kappel (the keeper/finder/disseminator of most of this knowledge) Copyright © 2000 Microsystems - THE document experts All Rights Reserved |