We met Robert Burton in July 1970, as described
somewhat in the next page in this sequence. The following here is a "new beginning particulars" as the result of inquiries received about the early days of our experience with the start up of the Fellowship of Friends. My reply to inquiries sent to me:
Subject: Re: RB in the beginning
> Stella,
No. Burton said he had started a "school." He said that someone at a
party had asked him a question and that's when he knew he was to be
the teacher and the questioner was to be the student, starting the
"school."
The person who asked the first question was Bonita.
> Did RB say that he had "passed his teacher" from
Yes. We were not at all sure what was meant by that, except in the
ordinary sense -- as we had no understanding then of ideas about
knowledge, being, and levels of consciousness. We guessed that maybe
Burton had learned all he could learn from his former teacher.
> How did RB become the leader?
and from Xxx:
> Good question from Xxxxx. I also would be very interested in the
Hahaha! No, read on.
Xxx also wrote to first inquirer:
> Great questions. I have a lot of imagination about the beginnings.
One suggestion in the activity of seeking insights about past events
is to keep in mind that the responses from me, although most sincere
and intended to convey "how it went" are necessarily the "tip of the
iceberg," as we are dealing with memory, some admixture perhaps of
what is known "now" with my early less informed reactions. Then, of
course, the imagination already occurring can "click" on something
written by me, and what I write is susceptible to misunderstanding
because I have no control over what is added to this by you.
Thus what you are receiving is "the likely story" not what could be
classified as "verifiable facts." This means that what you may
think about my posts at best is, "according to Stella...(blahblah)" if
you wish to exchange your "insights" derived from this sketchy (at
best) information. That is, there is not really a way for me to
transmit the whole and exact picture in the course of an inquiry
into what happened in 1970. I'll do the best I can, of course.
Burton started his "school" so, naturally, *he* was the leader. We
called him by his first name, and referred to him as "the teacher."
It was at this first meeting with him he also told us his birthday was
May 4, but that he changed it to May 5 because "5/5" sounded better
as he was a "budding Man No. 5." (I'm surprised now that we didn't
hear "Outer Limits" music at the time.
> When you first became involved with him, did he seem (or did he
He said he was a "budding Man No. 5." Now, I'd like you to think
back when you first heard of these ideas what you might have
thought of someone saying they are very close to being Man No. 5. It
would depend on what you understood at the time about this concept.
Basically, we could not know much about what he meant by that. We
weren't even familiar with the idea of Man No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on,
at that time. We also didn't know *then* what was meant by "man is
asleep," or "man is a machine."
We had been spending a lot of time reading J. Krishnamurti, and had
attended his talks in Santa Monica earlier in 1970. Krishnamurti's
theme was that one did "not need a teacher." We thought, "maybe not,
yet it might be easier for a little while; after all, we were
listening to and reading Krishamurti!" haha We figured we had to
"get a handle on this" some way or other.
Mostly what we knew was that we were interested in the 4th Way ideas we
had started reading a little about, maybe half-way through "In Search
of the Miraculous," and he talked about them a little, as well as
telling us something about himself.
The claim of being a "budding Man No. 5" meant very little
to us, except that whatever it was, he said he was close to being it.
We did notice that he *noticed* a lot of little things. He gave Harold
an observation. "Are you 'a-where' that every time you sip your
coffee, after you swallow, you give off a little smack and 'ahhhh'
sigh?" Harold was surprised to find that he was doing that! As
nobody had ever done that with us before, RB seemed pretty observant
to us at the time.
We also noticed, of course, that he spoke with an Arkansas accent when he
said "a-where." We were being much too polite to mention it then,
and when he again said at a meeting, "You must be *a-where* of yo-sef"
we decided to speak up. This *emphasis* on "a-where" is because he did sort of emphasize that word in his tone of voice.
We told him the word was
"Aware" and this activity eventually became personalized "elocution
lessons" for Robert at meetings with the group!
(Later years among old
friends we've joked about the possibility that WE created what you see
today in the form of a Burton well spoken.
More years later, with some experience, certainly we saw that we were
easily impressed. All of this, the ideas, meeting him, etc.,
were very new to us, in spite of my brief experience with his former
teacher, Alex Horn, whom he claimed to have "passed," whatever that
actually meant.
At that first meeting, he pointed our attention to various things in the restaurant, an
announcement over the loudspeaker, a bird outside the window, and
other things like that. His demeanor was calm, polite, pleasant,
and he explained that he was celebate, with lengthy comments
about how this saved vital energy, sex enery - "the energy of
creation," for the development of consciousness by controlling
attention.
[Hindsight is 20/20 vision, of course, and now I realize I could
do the same act myself today. I might have been able to do it in
1970, too, if I knew that was the "act of looking awake." That
he was lying about being celebate was discovered ten years later
when he admitted to me he always had a *big problem* keeping his
"task" in this area.
[The "task" to which he referred was given to him by his former teacher, Alex Horn, and the task was to NOT pester the young men in the group for sexual encounters, and eventually we found out that Alex had expelled him from his school for not being able to keep this task!
[*Anybody* can *pay attention* to various ticks and habits people
may not be aware of, and point them out to their surprise; anybody
can point out things other people are not noticing -- if that's the
game -- and it *does* look impressive to we uninitiated, sleeping
neophytes we were at the time.
Basically, Harold and I had no pre-conceived notions about how a
"conscious being" would behave or somehow demonstrate himself as
such. Without any criteria of this sort, we were just "there" with
him as one would be in an ordinary conversation with someone just
met. We were considering his offer to teach the ideas and help
people to find their way through practical work to understand them.
We were not internally dissecting that he "did this" or "did that"
as we went along. We were not thinking at all about how to "test"
him, in other words, having had *no* prior experience of this nature
(no gurus, no swamis, not even a psychology oriented person). In
other words, we were dummies, and we were *ripe.*
So, at $40/month, we said we would join, and our first meeting was
at the home of a doctor in Orinda, where Harold and I were the
6th and 7th people to join. We sat around kitchen table, and
Burton read aloud some passages from "Search" and explained how
we could observe and verify them. He didn't tell us "what" to
look for; he stressed just looking to see what we are able to
see.
**********************
Perhaps it seems I have explained more than necessary for folks
interested in this information -- don't take it personally, of
course, because it's my nature to try to curtail loose ends and
the above is being incorporated into the web site for this subject,
for further clarification.
Hope this is helpful here, folks. Further questions or comments
are welcome, too. Email me
|
E-Mail!] comments or questions!